Indirect vs direct measurement of magnesium and zinc in erythrocytes

P. A. Deuster, U. H. Trostmann, L. L. Bernier, Eran Dolev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


We evaluated three methods (two indirect and one direct) for determining the magnesium (Mg) and zinc (Zn) content of erythrocytes, to compare methodologic differences and to establish a method suitable for use in field studies. For the indirect methods, erythrocytes in whole blood were lysed by adding either de-ionized water (I) or nitric acid, 2 mol/L (II). For the direct method (III), erythrocytes were isolated by density centrifugation, washed, then digested in concentrated NHO3. Mg and Zn concentrations were measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry in plasma and whole blood for the indirect methods, and in the pellet for the direct method. Hematocrit and hemoglobin were measured, and erythrocytes were sized and counted on all samples. Within-run CVs for the three methods ranged from 2.2% with method III for Mg to 5.4% with method I for Zn. CVs for reproducibility of the analytical procedures ranged from 2.6% with method II for Zn to 4.2% with method I for the two cations. Analytical recoveries of added Mg and Zn ranged from 93.8 to 104.7%. When values for the three methods were compared, those by method I were significantly (p<0.05) lower than those by methods I and III. Values obtained by method II were 100.1% for Mg and 102.4% for Zn of those by the direct method. Thus, the indirect method with 2 mol/L HNO3 lysing solution provides a reproducible, reliable, accurate, and simple technique for measuring Mg and Zn in erythrocytes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)529-532
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Chemistry
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Indirect vs direct measurement of magnesium and zinc in erythrocytes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this