TY - CHAP
T1 - Incidences between points and lines in three dimensions
AU - Sharir, Micha
AU - Solomon, Noam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - We give a fairly elementary and simple proof that shows that the number of incidences between m points and n lines in R3, so that no plane contains more than s lines, is O (m1/2n3/4 + m2/3n1/3s1/3 + m + n) (in the precise statement, the constant of proportionality of the first and third terms depends, in a rather weak manner, on the relation between m and n). This bound, originally obtained by Guth and Katz (Ann Math 181:155–190, 2015, [10]) as a major step in their solution of Erdős’s distinct distances problem, is also a major new result in incidence geometry, an area that has picked up considerable momentum in the past decade. Its original proof uses fairly involved machinery from algebraic and differential geometry, so it is highly desirable to simplify the proof, in the interest of better understanding the geometric structure of the problem, and providing new tools for tackling similar problems. This has recently been undertaken by Guth (Discrete Comput Geom 53(2):428–444, 2015, [8]). The present paper presents a different and simpler derivation, with better bounds than those in Guth, and without the restrictive assumptions made there. Our result has a potential for applications to other incidence problems in higher dimensions.
AB - We give a fairly elementary and simple proof that shows that the number of incidences between m points and n lines in R3, so that no plane contains more than s lines, is O (m1/2n3/4 + m2/3n1/3s1/3 + m + n) (in the precise statement, the constant of proportionality of the first and third terms depends, in a rather weak manner, on the relation between m and n). This bound, originally obtained by Guth and Katz (Ann Math 181:155–190, 2015, [10]) as a major step in their solution of Erdős’s distinct distances problem, is also a major new result in incidence geometry, an area that has picked up considerable momentum in the past decade. Its original proof uses fairly involved machinery from algebraic and differential geometry, so it is highly desirable to simplify the proof, in the interest of better understanding the geometric structure of the problem, and providing new tools for tackling similar problems. This has recently been undertaken by Guth (Discrete Comput Geom 53(2):428–444, 2015, [8]). The present paper presents a different and simpler derivation, with better bounds than those in Guth, and without the restrictive assumptions made there. Our result has a potential for applications to other incidence problems in higher dimensions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056329895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-662-57413-3_15
DO - 10.1007/978-3-662-57413-3_15
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.chapter???
AN - SCOPUS:85056329895
T3 - Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies
SP - 359
EP - 383
BT - Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies
PB - Springer Berlin Heidelberg
ER -