Abstract
Groin and abdominal wall hernias constitute a frequent condition and contribute substantially to both elective and emergency surgery. Incarcerated hernias, given their dangerous potential, are usually admitted and operated upon on an emergency basis. Occasionally, a patient suspected of having an incarceration is rushed to the theater. During operation, often a condition other than a hernia is found. These misdiagnosed cases are the subject of this retrospective study, in which the records of 952 operations performed for hernia of any kind during a 2-year period were reviewed: the misdiagnosed cases were identified (postoperative diagnosis other than hernia), and their physical findings and history, pre- and postoperative diagnosis, and type of anesthesia were compared and analyzed. The investigation revealed that 17.5% of all the emergency operations (57 in total) were misdiagnosed and rushed to theater. In 90% of these cases, local or regional anesthesia would have sufficed if operated upon for the correct pathology - found intraoperatively. In our opinion, such a frequent condition as groin and abdominal hernias should represent no diagnostic dilemma, and every effort should be done to avoid unnecessary risks and complications. A brief literature review offers the correct approach to anamnesis, physical examination, and differential diagnosis of hernias while emphasizing the importance of proper preoperative diagnosis, particularly in the emergency setting.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 34-37 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Digestive Surgery |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1996 |
Keywords
- Anamnestic data
- Differential diagnosis
- Hernia
- Herniography
- Incarcerated hernia
- Physical examination
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Incarcerated Hernia: Are you sure, doctor?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver