TY - JOUR
T1 - Inadequate compensation and multiple equilibria
AU - D'Antoni, Massimo
AU - Tabbach, Avraham D.
N1 - Funding Information:
We want to thank Giuseppe Dari-Matticci, Nuno Garoupa and Ariel Porat for their helpful comments at different stages of our research. We took advantage of the discussion of earlier versions of the paper at the European Association of Law and Economics annual conference, the Siena/Toronto/Tel-Aviv joint workshop on Law & Economics and the Law & Economics workshop at Tel-Aviv University. All responsibility for errors remains ours. Avraham Tabbach gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Grant 040.11.315.
PY - 2014/6
Y1 - 2014/6
N2 - This paper studies alternative care situations in which the injurer is liable for harm but the victim is only partially compensated for her losses, for example, because the accident will result in serious bodily injury or death. In these situations, liability gives rise to multiple equilibria, some of them inefficient. We analyze possible solutions to the multiple equilibria problem including precaution costs liability and regulation. Notably, we show that in a dynamic setting punitive damages do not eliminate the inefficient equilibrium, but make its attainment less likely; we thus provide a novel justification for punitive damages which is consistent with legal doctrine and practice. Our analysis illustrates the importance of compensating victims, when feasible, rather than merely burdening injurers, for efficiency purposes. This suggests that common theoretical conclusions on accuracy in assessing damages and on decoupling damages and compensation, which leave victims only partially compensated, may not apply.
AB - This paper studies alternative care situations in which the injurer is liable for harm but the victim is only partially compensated for her losses, for example, because the accident will result in serious bodily injury or death. In these situations, liability gives rise to multiple equilibria, some of them inefficient. We analyze possible solutions to the multiple equilibria problem including precaution costs liability and regulation. Notably, we show that in a dynamic setting punitive damages do not eliminate the inefficient equilibrium, but make its attainment less likely; we thus provide a novel justification for punitive damages which is consistent with legal doctrine and practice. Our analysis illustrates the importance of compensating victims, when feasible, rather than merely burdening injurers, for efficiency purposes. This suggests that common theoretical conclusions on accuracy in assessing damages and on decoupling damages and compensation, which leave victims only partially compensated, may not apply.
KW - Accuracy
KW - Alternative care
KW - Inadequate compensation of victims
KW - Liability
KW - Liability insurance
KW - Punitive damages
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896539047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.irle.2014.02.003
DO - 10.1016/j.irle.2014.02.003
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84896539047
SN - 0144-8188
VL - 38
SP - 33
EP - 47
JO - International Review of Law and Economics
JF - International Review of Law and Economics
ER -