TY - JOUR
T1 - In vitro volume measurement by three-dimensional ultrasound
T2 - Comparison of two different systems
AU - Hösli, I. M.
AU - Tercanli, S.
AU - Herman, A.
AU - Kretschmann, M.
AU - Holzgreve, W.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - The aim of this study was to compare volumetric capabilities in vitro between two different three-dimensional technical modalities with a transvaginal transducer. We intended to evaluate the effect of different sizes and shapes on the accuracy of the measurements, and to establish criteria for choosing the appropriate system for three-dimensional volume measurement. We did not find significant differences between the two systems, either in the results or in their operation. We confirmed the high accuracy of three-dimensional volume measurements in vitro.
AB - The aim of this study was to compare volumetric capabilities in vitro between two different three-dimensional technical modalities with a transvaginal transducer. We intended to evaluate the effect of different sizes and shapes on the accuracy of the measurements, and to establish criteria for choosing the appropriate system for three-dimensional volume measurement. We did not find significant differences between the two systems, either in the results or in their operation. We confirmed the high accuracy of three-dimensional volume measurements in vitro.
KW - Three-dimensional ultrasound
KW - Transvaginal ultrasound
KW - Volume measurement in vitro
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031932004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11010017.x
DO - 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11010017.x
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0031932004
SN - 0960-7692
VL - 11
SP - 17
EP - 22
JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 1
ER -