TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving Bone Mineral Density Assessment Using Spectral Detector CT
AU - Van Hedent, Steven
AU - Su, Kuan Hao
AU - Jordan, David W.
AU - Eck, Brendan
AU - Liang, Fan
AU - Kessner, R.
AU - Kuo, Jung Wen
AU - Buls, Nico
AU - Klahr, Paul
AU - Ros, P.
AU - Muzic, Raymond F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry
PY - 2019/7/1
Y1 - 2019/7/1
N2 - Introduction: Bone mineral density (BMD) analysis by Dual-Energy x-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) can have some false negatives due to overlapping structures in the projections. Spectral Detector CT (SDCT) can overcome these limitations by providing volumetric information. We investigated its performance for BMD assessment and compared it to DXA and phantomless volumetric bone mineral density (PLvBMD), the latter known to systematically underestimate BMD. DXA is the current standard for BMD assessment, while PLvBMD is an established alternative for opportunistic BMD analysis using CT. Similarly to PLvBMD, spectral data could allow BMD screening opportunistically, without additional phantom calibration. Methodology: Ten concentrations of dipotassium phosphate (K2HPO4) ranging from 0 to 600 mg/ml, in an acrylic phantom were scanned using SDCT in four different, clinically-relevant scan conditions. Images were processed to estimate the K2HPO4 concentrations. A model representing a human lumbar spine (European Spine Phantom) was scanned and used for calibration via linear regression analysis. After calibration, our method was retrospectively applied to abdominal SDCT scans of 20 patients for BMD assessment, who also had PLvBMD and DXA. Performance of PLvBMD, DXA and our SDCT method were compared by sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value for decreased BMD. Results: There was excellent correlation (R2 >0.99, p < 0.01) between true and measured K2HPO4 concentrations for all scan conditions. Overall mean measurement error ranged from −11.5 ± 4.7 mg/ml (−2.8 ± 6.0%) to −12.3 ± 6.3 mg/ml (−4.8 ± 3.0%) depending on scan conditions. Using DXA as a reference standard, sensitivity/specificity for detecting decreased BMD in the scanned patients were 100%/73% using SDCT, 100%/40% using PLvBMD provided T-scores, and 90–100%/40–53% using PLvBMD hydroxyapatite density classifications, respectively. Conclusions: Our results show excellent sensitivity and high specificity of SDCT for detecting decreased BMD, demonstrating clinical feasibility. Further validation in prospective clinical trials will be required.
AB - Introduction: Bone mineral density (BMD) analysis by Dual-Energy x-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) can have some false negatives due to overlapping structures in the projections. Spectral Detector CT (SDCT) can overcome these limitations by providing volumetric information. We investigated its performance for BMD assessment and compared it to DXA and phantomless volumetric bone mineral density (PLvBMD), the latter known to systematically underestimate BMD. DXA is the current standard for BMD assessment, while PLvBMD is an established alternative for opportunistic BMD analysis using CT. Similarly to PLvBMD, spectral data could allow BMD screening opportunistically, without additional phantom calibration. Methodology: Ten concentrations of dipotassium phosphate (K2HPO4) ranging from 0 to 600 mg/ml, in an acrylic phantom were scanned using SDCT in four different, clinically-relevant scan conditions. Images were processed to estimate the K2HPO4 concentrations. A model representing a human lumbar spine (European Spine Phantom) was scanned and used for calibration via linear regression analysis. After calibration, our method was retrospectively applied to abdominal SDCT scans of 20 patients for BMD assessment, who also had PLvBMD and DXA. Performance of PLvBMD, DXA and our SDCT method were compared by sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value for decreased BMD. Results: There was excellent correlation (R2 >0.99, p < 0.01) between true and measured K2HPO4 concentrations for all scan conditions. Overall mean measurement error ranged from −11.5 ± 4.7 mg/ml (−2.8 ± 6.0%) to −12.3 ± 6.3 mg/ml (−4.8 ± 3.0%) depending on scan conditions. Using DXA as a reference standard, sensitivity/specificity for detecting decreased BMD in the scanned patients were 100%/73% using SDCT, 100%/40% using PLvBMD provided T-scores, and 90–100%/40–53% using PLvBMD hydroxyapatite density classifications, respectively. Conclusions: Our results show excellent sensitivity and high specificity of SDCT for detecting decreased BMD, demonstrating clinical feasibility. Further validation in prospective clinical trials will be required.
KW - Bone mineral density
KW - Dual-energy CT
KW - Dual-layer detector
KW - Osteopenia
KW - Quantitative computed tomography
KW - Spectral detector computed tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057102321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.10.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.10.004
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 30497869
AN - SCOPUS:85057102321
SN - 1094-6950
VL - 22
SP - 374
EP - 381
JO - Journal of Clinical Densitometry
JF - Journal of Clinical Densitometry
IS - 3
ER -