Improving Bone Mineral Density Assessment Using Spectral Detector CT

Steven Van Hedent, Kuan Hao Su, David W. Jordan, Brendan Eck, Fan Liang, R. Kessner, Jung Wen Kuo, Nico Buls, Paul Klahr, P. Ros, Raymond F. Muzic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Bone mineral density (BMD) analysis by Dual-Energy x-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) can have some false negatives due to overlapping structures in the projections. Spectral Detector CT (SDCT) can overcome these limitations by providing volumetric information. We investigated its performance for BMD assessment and compared it to DXA and phantomless volumetric bone mineral density (PLvBMD), the latter known to systematically underestimate BMD. DXA is the current standard for BMD assessment, while PLvBMD is an established alternative for opportunistic BMD analysis using CT. Similarly to PLvBMD, spectral data could allow BMD screening opportunistically, without additional phantom calibration. Methodology: Ten concentrations of dipotassium phosphate (K2HPO4) ranging from 0 to 600 mg/ml, in an acrylic phantom were scanned using SDCT in four different, clinically-relevant scan conditions. Images were processed to estimate the K2HPO4 concentrations. A model representing a human lumbar spine (European Spine Phantom) was scanned and used for calibration via linear regression analysis. After calibration, our method was retrospectively applied to abdominal SDCT scans of 20 patients for BMD assessment, who also had PLvBMD and DXA. Performance of PLvBMD, DXA and our SDCT method were compared by sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value for decreased BMD. Results: There was excellent correlation (R2 >0.99, p < 0.01) between true and measured K2HPO4 concentrations for all scan conditions. Overall mean measurement error ranged from −11.5 ± 4.7 mg/ml (−2.8 ± 6.0%) to −12.3 ± 6.3 mg/ml (−4.8 ± 3.0%) depending on scan conditions. Using DXA as a reference standard, sensitivity/specificity for detecting decreased BMD in the scanned patients were 100%/73% using SDCT, 100%/40% using PLvBMD provided T-scores, and 90–100%/40–53% using PLvBMD hydroxyapatite density classifications, respectively. Conclusions: Our results show excellent sensitivity and high specificity of SDCT for detecting decreased BMD, demonstrating clinical feasibility. Further validation in prospective clinical trials will be required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)374-381
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bone mineral density
  • Dual-energy CT
  • Dual-layer detector
  • Osteopenia
  • Quantitative computed tomography
  • Spectral detector computed tomography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving Bone Mineral Density Assessment Using Spectral Detector CT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this