TY - JOUR
T1 - Implicit sequence learning in individuals with Parkinson's disease
T2 - The added value of using an ocular version of the serial reaction time (O-SRT) task
AU - Vakil, Eli
AU - Schwizer Ashkenazi, Simone
AU - Nevet-Perez, Mishael
AU - Hassin-Baer, Sharon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Introduction: Though the majority of studies reported impaired sequence learning in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) tested with the Serial Reaction Time (SRT) task, findings are inconclusive. To elucidate this point, we used an eye tracker in an ocular SRT task version (O-SRT) that in addition to RT, enables extraction of two measures reflecting different cognitive processes, namely, Correct Anticipation (CA) and number of Stucks. Methods: Individuals with PD (n = 29) and matched controls (n = 31) were tested with the O-SRT task, consisting of a repeated sequence of six blocks, then a block with an interference sequence followed by an original sequence block. Results: Unlike controls, patients with PD did not improve in CA rate across learning trials, did not show an increase in RT when presented with the interference sequence, and showed a significantly higher rate of Stucks. Conclusions: Low CA rate and high Stucks rate emerge as the cardinal deficits leading to impaired sequence learning following PD. These are viewed as reflecting difficulty in exploration for an efficient learning strategy. This study highlights the advantage in using the O-SRT task, which enables the generation of several informative measures of learning, allowing better characterization of the PD effect on sequence learning.
AB - Introduction: Though the majority of studies reported impaired sequence learning in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) tested with the Serial Reaction Time (SRT) task, findings are inconclusive. To elucidate this point, we used an eye tracker in an ocular SRT task version (O-SRT) that in addition to RT, enables extraction of two measures reflecting different cognitive processes, namely, Correct Anticipation (CA) and number of Stucks. Methods: Individuals with PD (n = 29) and matched controls (n = 31) were tested with the O-SRT task, consisting of a repeated sequence of six blocks, then a block with an interference sequence followed by an original sequence block. Results: Unlike controls, patients with PD did not improve in CA rate across learning trials, did not show an increase in RT when presented with the interference sequence, and showed a significantly higher rate of Stucks. Conclusions: Low CA rate and high Stucks rate emerge as the cardinal deficits leading to impaired sequence learning following PD. These are viewed as reflecting difficulty in exploration for an efficient learning strategy. This study highlights the advantage in using the O-SRT task, which enables the generation of several informative measures of learning, allowing better characterization of the PD effect on sequence learning.
KW - Eye tracking
KW - Implicit sequence learning
KW - PD
KW - SRT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096645620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105654
DO - 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105654
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 33246230
AN - SCOPUS:85096645620
SN - 0278-2626
VL - 147
JO - Brain and Cognition
JF - Brain and Cognition
M1 - 105654
ER -