TY - JOUR
T1 - Implant diameter and length influence on survival
T2 - Interim results during the first 2 years of function of implants by a single manufacturer
AU - Mijiritsky, Eitan
AU - Mazor, Ziv
AU - Lorean, Adi
AU - Levin, Liran
PY - 2013/8
Y1 - 2013/8
N2 - OBJECTIVES:: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of implant length and diameter on implant survival. METHODS:: A retrospective cohort of 787 consecutive patients from 2 private practices between the years 2008 and 2011 had been evaluated. Patient demographics, site and implant characteristics, and time of follow-up were recorded from the medical files. RESULTS:: Overall, 3043 implants were investigated. Overall survival rate was 98.7% with 39 implant failures recorded. Survival rates for narrow- (<3.75 mm), regular- (3.75-5 mm), and wide- (>5 mm) diameter implants were 98.2%, 98.7%, and 98.5%, respectively (P = 0.89). Survival rates of short (<10 mm) and regular (10 mm and above) implants were 97% and 98.7%, respectively (P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS:: Implant length and diameter were not found to be significant factors affecting implant survival during the first 2 years of function in the present investigation of this specific implant system by a single manufacturer. Further long-term follow-up studies are warranted because 2-years are only interim short-term results when dealing with dental implants.
AB - OBJECTIVES:: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of implant length and diameter on implant survival. METHODS:: A retrospective cohort of 787 consecutive patients from 2 private practices between the years 2008 and 2011 had been evaluated. Patient demographics, site and implant characteristics, and time of follow-up were recorded from the medical files. RESULTS:: Overall, 3043 implants were investigated. Overall survival rate was 98.7% with 39 implant failures recorded. Survival rates for narrow- (<3.75 mm), regular- (3.75-5 mm), and wide- (>5 mm) diameter implants were 98.2%, 98.7%, and 98.5%, respectively (P = 0.89). Survival rates of short (<10 mm) and regular (10 mm and above) implants were 97% and 98.7%, respectively (P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS:: Implant length and diameter were not found to be significant factors affecting implant survival during the first 2 years of function in the present investigation of this specific implant system by a single manufacturer. Further long-term follow-up studies are warranted because 2-years are only interim short-term results when dealing with dental implants.
KW - alveolar bone
KW - bone width
KW - dental implantation
KW - mandible
KW - maxilla
KW - successsurvival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881022090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829afac0
DO - 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829afac0
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 23811719
AN - SCOPUS:84881022090
SN - 1056-6163
VL - 22
SP - 394
EP - 398
JO - The International journal of oral implantology : implantologist
JF - The International journal of oral implantology : implantologist
IS - 4
ER -