TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of a social parasite on ant host populations depends on host species, habitat and year
AU - Scharf, Inon
AU - Bauer, Sabine
AU - Fischer-Blass, Birgit
AU - Foitzik, Susanne
PY - 2011/7
Y1 - 2011/7
N2 - Parasites often affect the abundance and life-history traits of their hosts. We studied the impact of a social parasite - a slavemaking ant - on host ant communities using two complementary field manipulations. In the first experiment, we analysed the effect of social parasite presence on host populations in one habitat. In a second experiment, conducted in two habitats, we used a cross-fostering design, analysing the effect of sympatric and allopatric social parasites. In the first experiment, host colonies benefited to some extent from residing in parasite-free areas, showing increased total production. Yet, in the second experiment, host colonies in plots containing social parasites were more productive, and this effect was most evident in response to allopatric social parasites. We propose several explanations for these inconsistent results, which are related to environmental variability. The discrepancies between the two habitats can be explained well by ecological variation as a result of differences in altitudes and climate. For example, ant colonies in the colder habitat were larger and, for one host species, colonies were more often polygynous. In addition, our long-term documentation - a total of four measurements of community structure in 6 years - showed temporal variation in abundance and life-history traits of ant colonies, unrelated to the manipulations.
AB - Parasites often affect the abundance and life-history traits of their hosts. We studied the impact of a social parasite - a slavemaking ant - on host ant communities using two complementary field manipulations. In the first experiment, we analysed the effect of social parasite presence on host populations in one habitat. In a second experiment, conducted in two habitats, we used a cross-fostering design, analysing the effect of sympatric and allopatric social parasites. In the first experiment, host colonies benefited to some extent from residing in parasite-free areas, showing increased total production. Yet, in the second experiment, host colonies in plots containing social parasites were more productive, and this effect was most evident in response to allopatric social parasites. We propose several explanations for these inconsistent results, which are related to environmental variability. The discrepancies between the two habitats can be explained well by ecological variation as a result of differences in altitudes and climate. For example, ant colonies in the colder habitat were larger and, for one host species, colonies were more often polygynous. In addition, our long-term documentation - a total of four measurements of community structure in 6 years - showed temporal variation in abundance and life-history traits of ant colonies, unrelated to the manipulations.
KW - Host-parasite interactions
KW - Life history
KW - Local adaptation
KW - Predation
KW - Social insects
KW - Sympatric and allopatric predators
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959195627&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01638.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01638.x
M3 - מאמר
AN - SCOPUS:79959195627
VL - 103
SP - 559
EP - 570
JO - Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
JF - Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
SN - 0024-4066
IS - 3
ER -