TY - JOUR
T1 - Immediate versus expedient emergent laparotomy in unstable isolated abdominal trauma patients
AU - Israeli Trauma Group
AU - Paran, Maya
AU - Moran, B.
AU - Khan, M.
AU - Yehuda, H.
AU - Adi, G.
AU - Joseph, D. J.
AU - Boris, K.
AU - Acker, A.
AU - Aviran, N.
AU - Bahouth, H.
AU - Bar, A.
AU - Becker, A.
AU - Ben Ely, M.
AU - Fadeev, D.
AU - Grevtsev, I.
AU - Jeroukhimov, I.
AU - Kedar, A.
AU - Korin, A.
AU - Lerner, A.
AU - Qarawany, M.
AU - Schwarz, A. D.
AU - Shomar, W.
AU - Soffer, D.
AU - Stein, M.
AU - Venturero, M.
AU - Weiss, M.
AU - Yaslowitz, O.
AU - Zoarets, I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Royal College of Surgeons of England. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Introduction Unstable abdominal trauma patients should be treated with emergent laparotomy. However, few studies have evaluated the association between time to surgery and survival in these patients. We aimed to assess the influence of time to laparotomy on outcomes in blunt and penetrating unstable abdominal trauma patients. Methods This retrospective study includes patients with abdominal injuries, systolic blood pressure <90mmHg on arrival, admitted in Israel during 2000-2018. Data regarding patients' characteristics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), time to surgery, length of hospital stay and mortality were collected via The Israeli National Trauma Registry. Results Overall, 69 blunt and 127 penetrating injury patients were included in the study. For blunt and penetrating trauma patients with ISS ≤14, no differences in outcome were found between patients who underwent laparotomy within 60min of admission and those who underwent laparotomy within 60-120min of admission. In patients with blunt trauma, ISS ≥16, and GCS <15, mortality was higher in the immediate laparotomy group (p = 0.004 and 0.049, respectively). Conclusions In patients with a penetrating injury, no differences in mortality between immediate and expedient laparotomy were demonstrated. In patients with a blunt injury, with ISS ≥16 and GCS <15, mortality was higher among the immediate laparotomy group.
AB - Introduction Unstable abdominal trauma patients should be treated with emergent laparotomy. However, few studies have evaluated the association between time to surgery and survival in these patients. We aimed to assess the influence of time to laparotomy on outcomes in blunt and penetrating unstable abdominal trauma patients. Methods This retrospective study includes patients with abdominal injuries, systolic blood pressure <90mmHg on arrival, admitted in Israel during 2000-2018. Data regarding patients' characteristics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), time to surgery, length of hospital stay and mortality were collected via The Israeli National Trauma Registry. Results Overall, 69 blunt and 127 penetrating injury patients were included in the study. For blunt and penetrating trauma patients with ISS ≤14, no differences in outcome were found between patients who underwent laparotomy within 60min of admission and those who underwent laparotomy within 60-120min of admission. In patients with blunt trauma, ISS ≥16, and GCS <15, mortality was higher in the immediate laparotomy group (p = 0.004 and 0.049, respectively). Conclusions In patients with a penetrating injury, no differences in mortality between immediate and expedient laparotomy were demonstrated. In patients with a blunt injury, with ISS ≥16 and GCS <15, mortality was higher among the immediate laparotomy group.
KW - Abdominal trauma
KW - Emergency surgery
KW - Laparotomy
KW - Mortality
KW - Surgery timing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217003642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0081
DO - 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0081
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 38836369
AN - SCOPUS:85217003642
SN - 0035-8843
VL - 107
SP - 119
EP - 124
JO - Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
JF - Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
IS - 2
ER -