Ignoring irrelevant stimuli in latent inhibition and Stroop paradigms: The effects of schizotypy and gender

Oren Kaplan*, Robert E. Lubow

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Latent inhibition (LI), poor evidence of learning following preexposure to a task-irrelevant stimulus, reflects the ability to ignore inconsequential events. Stroop interference represents a failure to inhibit processing of a task-irrelevant word when it is incongruent with the required naming of the word's print color. The apparent commonality between the two effects is in contradiction to the literature, which indicates that LI is affected by schizotypy and schizophrenia, and perhaps gender, while Stroop interference generated by the trial-to-trial procedure is unaltered by those variables. In the present experiment, low schizotypal healthy males, but not females, exhibited LI. The same groups did not differ on Stroop interference. The results are discussed in terms of different processing requirements for task-irrelevant stimuli that are an integral part of the task-relevant target stimulus (as in Stroop) or separated from it in space (as in LI).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-45
Number of pages6
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume186
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 30 Mar 2011

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Gender
  • Interference
  • Latent inhibition
  • Schizophrenia
  • Schizotypy
  • Stroop

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ignoring irrelevant stimuli in latent inhibition and Stroop paradigms: The effects of schizotypy and gender'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this