TY - JOUR
T1 - ICG-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma is as effective as blue dye
T2 - A retrospective analysis
AU - Lavy, Danielle
AU - Shimonovitz, Michal
AU - Keidar, Daniel
AU - Warshavsky, Anton
AU - Lessing, Yonatan
AU - Abu-Abeid, Adam
AU - Schneebaum, Schlomo
AU - Miodovnik, Mor
AU - Nizri, Eran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Introduction: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a key procedure in the staging and management of melanoma. Traditionally, it is performed using a dual-mapping technique combining a radioactive isotope (RI) and blue dye (BD). Fluorescence-guided surgery with indocyanine green (ICG) has emerged as an alternative tracer, offering potential advantages in real-time visualization and operative efficiency. This study compares the efficacy of RI + ICG with RI + BD in SLNB for melanoma. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single center, including 311 patients who underwent SLNB for melanoma. Patients were divided into two groups: RI + BD (n = 227, January 2010–August 2022) and RI + ICG (n = 84, August 2022–February 2024). SLN detection rates, positive SLN rates, operative times, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: Both groups were clinically and pathologically comparable. SLN detection rates were 100 % in the RI + BD group and 98.8 % in the RI + ICG group (p = 0.1). The median number of lymph nodes resected was lower in the RI + ICG group as compared to the RI + BD group (p = 0.047). While positive SLN rates were higher in the RI + ICG group (9.5 % vs. 6.2 %), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.3). ICG alone could not identify all the positive SLN. Postoperative complications, including seroma, did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: ICG-guided SLNB is comparable to BD-guided SLNB in terms of detection rate and SLN positivity, although it can not be used alone to identify all positive SLNBs. ICG-based fluorescence imaging is a promising technique that may enhance surgical efficiency in melanoma management.
AB - Introduction: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a key procedure in the staging and management of melanoma. Traditionally, it is performed using a dual-mapping technique combining a radioactive isotope (RI) and blue dye (BD). Fluorescence-guided surgery with indocyanine green (ICG) has emerged as an alternative tracer, offering potential advantages in real-time visualization and operative efficiency. This study compares the efficacy of RI + ICG with RI + BD in SLNB for melanoma. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single center, including 311 patients who underwent SLNB for melanoma. Patients were divided into two groups: RI + BD (n = 227, January 2010–August 2022) and RI + ICG (n = 84, August 2022–February 2024). SLN detection rates, positive SLN rates, operative times, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: Both groups were clinically and pathologically comparable. SLN detection rates were 100 % in the RI + BD group and 98.8 % in the RI + ICG group (p = 0.1). The median number of lymph nodes resected was lower in the RI + ICG group as compared to the RI + BD group (p = 0.047). While positive SLN rates were higher in the RI + ICG group (9.5 % vs. 6.2 %), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.3). ICG alone could not identify all the positive SLN. Postoperative complications, including seroma, did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: ICG-guided SLNB is comparable to BD-guided SLNB in terms of detection rate and SLN positivity, although it can not be used alone to identify all positive SLNBs. ICG-based fluorescence imaging is a promising technique that may enhance surgical efficiency in melanoma management.
KW - Dual tracer technique
KW - Fluorescence guided surgery
KW - Melanoma
KW - Sentinel lymph node biopsy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209727223&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102167
DO - 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102167
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 39581000
AN - SCOPUS:85209727223
SN - 0960-7404
VL - 57
JO - Surgical Oncology
JF - Surgical Oncology
M1 - 102167
ER -