TY - JOUR
T1 - How nutritional risk is assessed and managed in European hospitals
T2 - A survey of 21,007 patients findings from the 2007-2008 cross-sectional nutritionDay survey
AU - Schindler, Karin
AU - Pernicka, Elisabeth
AU - Laviano, Alessandro
AU - Howard, Pat
AU - Schütz, Tatjana
AU - Bauer, Peter
AU - Grecu, Irina
AU - Jonkers, Cora
AU - Kondrup, Jens
AU - Ljungqvist, Olle
AU - Mouhieddine, Mohamed
AU - Pichard, Claude
AU - Singer, Pierre
AU - Schneider, Stéphane
AU - Schuh, Christian
AU - Hiesmayr, Michael
N1 - Funding Information:
The nutritionDay Study 2006 was funded by an international project submission grant of the Medical University Vienna (55%), an unrestricted educational grant of the Austrian Association for Clinical Nutrition (AKE; 15%) and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN; 30%). The project outline and idea for the nutritionDay Study was from MH. The project was designed by MH, KS, PB, PH, JK and coordinated by KS. Data were acquired by CS, KS, MM. EP analyzed the data and AL, MH, PB, CP, OL, SS, PS, TS, KS, EP, PH, CJ, JK were responsible for interpretation of data. The multilingual project was harmonized by PH, KS, CJ, IG, CS, TS. MH, EP, PB, OL, AL. KS, AL, PH, CP wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - Background & aims: Recognition and treatment of undernutrition in hospitalized patients are not often a priority in clinical practice. Objectives: We investigated how the nutritional risk of patients is determined and whether such assessment influences daily nutritional care across Europe and in Israeli hospitals. Methods: 1217 units from 325 hospitals in 25 countries with 21,007 patients participated in a longitudinal survey " nutritionDay" 2007/2008 undertaken in Europe and Israel. Screening practice, the type of tools used and whether energy requirements and intake are assessed and monitored were surveyed using standardized questionnaires. Results: Fifty-two percent (range 21-73%) of the units in the different regions reported a screening routine which was most often performed with locally developed methods and less often with national tools, the Nutrition Risk Screening-2002, or the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool. Twenty-seven percent of the patients were subjectively classified as being " at nutritional risk" , with substantial differences existing between regions. Independent factors influencing the classification of nutritional risk included age, BMI <18.5 kg/m2, unintentional weight loss, reduced food intake in the previous week and on nutritionDay (for all parameters, p < 0.0001). The energy goal was defined as >=1500 kcal in 76% of the patients, but 43% of patients did not reach this goal. Conclusions: The process of nutrition risk assessment varied between units and countries. Additionally, energy goals were frequently not met. More effort is needed to implement current guidelines within daily clinical practice.
AB - Background & aims: Recognition and treatment of undernutrition in hospitalized patients are not often a priority in clinical practice. Objectives: We investigated how the nutritional risk of patients is determined and whether such assessment influences daily nutritional care across Europe and in Israeli hospitals. Methods: 1217 units from 325 hospitals in 25 countries with 21,007 patients participated in a longitudinal survey " nutritionDay" 2007/2008 undertaken in Europe and Israel. Screening practice, the type of tools used and whether energy requirements and intake are assessed and monitored were surveyed using standardized questionnaires. Results: Fifty-two percent (range 21-73%) of the units in the different regions reported a screening routine which was most often performed with locally developed methods and less often with national tools, the Nutrition Risk Screening-2002, or the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool. Twenty-seven percent of the patients were subjectively classified as being " at nutritional risk" , with substantial differences existing between regions. Independent factors influencing the classification of nutritional risk included age, BMI <18.5 kg/m2, unintentional weight loss, reduced food intake in the previous week and on nutritionDay (for all parameters, p < 0.0001). The energy goal was defined as >=1500 kcal in 76% of the patients, but 43% of patients did not reach this goal. Conclusions: The process of nutrition risk assessment varied between units and countries. Additionally, energy goals were frequently not met. More effort is needed to implement current guidelines within daily clinical practice.
KW - Europe
KW - NutritionDay
KW - Nutritional risk
KW - Practice
KW - Screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957337707&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.04.001
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 20434820
AN - SCOPUS:77957337707
SN - 0261-5614
VL - 29
SP - 552
EP - 559
JO - Clinical Nutrition
JF - Clinical Nutrition
IS - 5
ER -