TY - JOUR
T1 - How far is the suffering? The role of psychological distance and victims’ identifiability in donation decisions
AU - Kogut, Tehila
AU - Ritov, Ilana
AU - Rubaltelli, Enrico
AU - Liberman, Nira
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Society for Judgment and Decision making. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - We are regularly told about people at various locations around the globe, both near and far, who are in distress or in dire need. In the present research, we examined how the prospective donor’s psychological distance from a given victim may interact with the victim’s identification to determine the donor’s willingness to accede to requests for donations to help the victim in question. In three studies, we measured willingness to donate (Studies 1 & 2) and actual donations (Study 3) to identified or unidentified victims, while measuring (Study 1) or manipulating (Studies 2 & 3) the psychological distance between prospective donors and the recipients. Results indicate that increasing the psychological distance between prospective donors and victims decreases willingness to help — but only when the victims are unidentified, not when they are identified. This suggests that victim’s identification mitigates the effect of distance on donor’s willingness to help.
AB - We are regularly told about people at various locations around the globe, both near and far, who are in distress or in dire need. In the present research, we examined how the prospective donor’s psychological distance from a given victim may interact with the victim’s identification to determine the donor’s willingness to accede to requests for donations to help the victim in question. In three studies, we measured willingness to donate (Studies 1 & 2) and actual donations (Study 3) to identified or unidentified victims, while measuring (Study 1) or manipulating (Studies 2 & 3) the psychological distance between prospective donors and the recipients. Results indicate that increasing the psychological distance between prospective donors and victims decreases willingness to help — but only when the victims are unidentified, not when they are identified. This suggests that victim’s identification mitigates the effect of distance on donor’s willingness to help.
KW - Distance
KW - Donation decisions
KW - Identifiable victim effect
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054311931&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85054311931
SN - 1930-2975
VL - 13
SP - 458
EP - 466
JO - Judgment and Decision Making
JF - Judgment and Decision Making
IS - 5
ER -