How accurate are neonatologists in identifying clinical jaundice in newborns?

Arieh Riskin*, Martha Abend-Weinger, David Bader

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This study reevaluates the clinical ability to accurately identify jaundice in neonates. Three hundred seventy-one term infants were clinically asseseed for jaundice, before discharge home on day 2 to 3 of life. Bilirubin levels obtained at the same time were significantly higher in the newborns clinically diagnosed as being jaundiced. Our neonatologists were able to diagnose jaundice at clinically low levels, and not to misdiagnose significant hyperbilirubinemia in the majority of the infants. The trained human eye can still discriminate between the jaundiced and nonjaundiced newborn, and clinical impression of jaundice remains a reliable primary screening tool for significant neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-158
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Pediatrics
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2003
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'How accurate are neonatologists in identifying clinical jaundice in newborns?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this