History: Devotionist Textual Scholarship and Historical Consciousness in Early Modern Responsa

Tamara Morsel-Eisenberg*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

We often think of the historical approach as the ultimate critical outlook. But this is only true of certain kinds of historicism. There are different ways in which scholars have embraced historical perspectives that were compatible with devotionist outlooks. This chapter presents one such example in the responsa (rabbinic answers to concrete questions of Jewish religious law) of Rabbi Yair ?ayim Bacharach, who lived in the German lands 1638-1702. One of R. Bachrach’s responsa exhibits his approach to the Zohar. While R. Bacharach wholeheartedly considers the work sacred, he nevertheless recognizes and engages with its historical context. R. Bacharach’s approach suggests an early modern historical attitude that need not be opposed to a devotionist stance. This attitude is then compared to the tools employed by early modern humanists and antiquarians, which were similarly critical yet not necessarily opposed to devotionism. The chapter suggests that our assumptions about the incompatibility of historical criticism and devotion stem from a very specific school of nineteenth-century historicism. These early modern models present a different way.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWhen Jews Argue
Subtitle of host publicationBetween the University and the Beit Midrash
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages77-102
Number of pages26
ISBN (Electronic)9781000969542
ISBN (Print)9781032427409
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2023
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'History: Devotionist Textual Scholarship and Historical Consciousness in Early Modern Responsa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this