TY - JOUR
T1 - High-power holmium laser versus thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in patients with glands larger than 80 ml
T2 - Results from the Prostate Endoscopic EnucLeation study group
AU - Lim, Ee Jean
AU - Castellani, Daniele
AU - Somani, Bhaskar K.
AU - Gökce, Mehmet I.
AU - Fong, Khi Yung
AU - Sancha, Fernando G.
AU - Herrmann, Thomas R.W.
AU - Biligere, Sarvajit
AU - Tursunkulov, Azimdjon N.
AU - Dellabella, Marco
AU - Sofer, Mario
AU - Enikeev, Dmitry
AU - Petov, Vladislav
AU - Gadzhiev, Nariman
AU - Elterman, Dean
AU - Mahajan, Abhay
AU - Socarras, Moises R.
AU - Yunusov, Dilmurod S.
AU - Nasirov, Furkat
AU - Teoh, Jeremy Y.C.
AU - Gauhar, Vineet
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Asian Pacific Prostate Society
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Background: Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) has gained acceptance as an equitable alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Our primary aim is to compare peri-operative outcomes of EEP using thulium fiber laser (TFL) against high-power holmium laser (HPHL) in hands of experienced surgeons for large prostates (≥80 ml in volume). Secondary outcomes were assess complications within 1 year of follow up. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent EEP with TFL or HPHL in 13 centers (January 2019-January 2023). Patients with prostate volume ≥80 ml were included, while those with concomitant prostate cancer, previous prostate/urethral surgery, and pelvic radiotherapy were excluded. Results: Of 1,929 included patients, HPHL was utilized in 1,459 and TFL in 470. After propensity score matching (PSM) for baseline characteristics, 247 patients from each group were analyzed. Overall operative time (90 [70, 120] vs. 52.5 [39, 93] min, P < 0.001) and enucleation time (90 [70, 105] vs. 38 [25, 70] min, P < 0.001) were longer in the TFL group, with comparable morcellation time (13 [10, 19.5] vs. 13 [10, 16.5] min, P = 0.914). In terms of postoperative outcomes, there were no differences in 30-day complications such as acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection or sepsis. In the PSM cohort, univariable analyses showed that higher age, lower preoperative Qmax, higher preoperative PVRU, and longer operation time were associated with higher odds of postoperative incontinence, while 2-lobe enucleation had lower odds of incontinence compared to 3-lobe enucleation. Conclusions: This real-world study reaffirms that HPHL and TFL in large prostates are equally efficacious in terms of 30-day complications. TFL with the en-bloc technique has a shorter operative time which significantly improves short- and medium-term functional outcomes.
AB - Background: Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) has gained acceptance as an equitable alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Our primary aim is to compare peri-operative outcomes of EEP using thulium fiber laser (TFL) against high-power holmium laser (HPHL) in hands of experienced surgeons for large prostates (≥80 ml in volume). Secondary outcomes were assess complications within 1 year of follow up. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent EEP with TFL or HPHL in 13 centers (January 2019-January 2023). Patients with prostate volume ≥80 ml were included, while those with concomitant prostate cancer, previous prostate/urethral surgery, and pelvic radiotherapy were excluded. Results: Of 1,929 included patients, HPHL was utilized in 1,459 and TFL in 470. After propensity score matching (PSM) for baseline characteristics, 247 patients from each group were analyzed. Overall operative time (90 [70, 120] vs. 52.5 [39, 93] min, P < 0.001) and enucleation time (90 [70, 105] vs. 38 [25, 70] min, P < 0.001) were longer in the TFL group, with comparable morcellation time (13 [10, 19.5] vs. 13 [10, 16.5] min, P = 0.914). In terms of postoperative outcomes, there were no differences in 30-day complications such as acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection or sepsis. In the PSM cohort, univariable analyses showed that higher age, lower preoperative Qmax, higher preoperative PVRU, and longer operation time were associated with higher odds of postoperative incontinence, while 2-lobe enucleation had lower odds of incontinence compared to 3-lobe enucleation. Conclusions: This real-world study reaffirms that HPHL and TFL in large prostates are equally efficacious in terms of 30-day complications. TFL with the en-bloc technique has a shorter operative time which significantly improves short- and medium-term functional outcomes.
KW - Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate
KW - Laser therapy
KW - Postoperative complications
KW - Prostatic hyperplasia
KW - Urinary incontinence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184755523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.12.001
DO - 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.12.001
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 38523902
AN - SCOPUS:85184755523
SN - 2287-8882
VL - 12
SP - 40
EP - 45
JO - Prostate International
JF - Prostate International
IS - 1
ER -