Abstract
In multi-hop networks, the actions taken by individual intermediate nodes are typically hidden from the communicating endpoints; all the endpoints can observe is whether or not the end-to-end transmission was successful. Therefore, in the absence of incentives to the contrary, rational (i.e., selfish) intermediate nodes may choose to forward packets at a low priority or simply not forward packets at all. Using a principal-agent model, we show how the hidden-action problem can be overcome through appropriate design of contracts, in both the direct (the endpoints contract with each individual router) and recursive (each router contracts with the next down-stream router) cases. We further demonstrate that per-hop monitoring does not necessarily improve the utility of the principal or the social welfare in the system. In addition, we generalize existing mechanisms that deal with hidden-information to handle scenarios involving both hidden-information and hidden-action.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages | 117-126 |
Number of pages | 10 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2005 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | EC'05: 6th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce - Vancouver, Canada Duration: 5 Jun 2005 → 8 Jun 2005 |
Conference
Conference | EC'05: 6th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Canada |
City | Vancouver |
Period | 5/06/05 → 8/06/05 |
Keywords
- Contracts
- Hidden-action
- Incentives
- Mechanism design
- Moral-hazard
- Multi-hop
- Principal-agent model
- Routing