TY - JOUR
T1 - Hepatitis B Virus-Induced Resistance to Sorafenib and Lenvatinib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells
T2 - Implications for Cell Viability and Signaling Pathways
AU - Esmael, Narmen
AU - Lubin, Ido
AU - Tur-Kaspa, Ran
AU - Zemel, Romy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Background/Objectives: Sorafenib and lenvatinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. This study investigates how hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection affects their efficacy in HepG2 hepatoma cells. Methods: HepG2 and HBV-infected HepG2/2215 cells were treated with varying concentrations of both drugs. The cell viability, cell cycle gene expression, cycle progression, and phosphorylation levels of ERK and AKT were analyzed. Results: The HBV-infected cells showed significant alterations in their cell cycle gene expressions, with an 80-fold increase in CCND2 expression and a higher proportion of cells in the G2/M phase, indicating enhanced proliferation. While both drugs decreased HepG2 cell viability in a concentration-dependent manner, HBV infection conferred resistance, as evidenced by the increased viable cells in the HepG2/2215 cultures. Sorafenib and lenvatinib decreased key cyclin and cyclin-dependent kinase expressions in uninfected cells, with less effect on the HBV-infected cells. Both drugs lowered the pERK and pAKT levels in the HepG2 cells. In the HBV-infected cells, sorafenib reduced the pERK and pAKT levels to a lesser extent. However, treatment with lenvatinib elevated the levels of pERK and pAKT. Conclusions: In conclusion, HBV infection increases resistance to both sorafenib and lenvatinib in hepatoma cells by influencing the cell cycle regulatory genes and critical signaling pathways. However, the resistance mechanisms likely differ between the two medications.
AB - Background/Objectives: Sorafenib and lenvatinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. This study investigates how hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection affects their efficacy in HepG2 hepatoma cells. Methods: HepG2 and HBV-infected HepG2/2215 cells were treated with varying concentrations of both drugs. The cell viability, cell cycle gene expression, cycle progression, and phosphorylation levels of ERK and AKT were analyzed. Results: The HBV-infected cells showed significant alterations in their cell cycle gene expressions, with an 80-fold increase in CCND2 expression and a higher proportion of cells in the G2/M phase, indicating enhanced proliferation. While both drugs decreased HepG2 cell viability in a concentration-dependent manner, HBV infection conferred resistance, as evidenced by the increased viable cells in the HepG2/2215 cultures. Sorafenib and lenvatinib decreased key cyclin and cyclin-dependent kinase expressions in uninfected cells, with less effect on the HBV-infected cells. Both drugs lowered the pERK and pAKT levels in the HepG2 cells. In the HBV-infected cells, sorafenib reduced the pERK and pAKT levels to a lesser extent. However, treatment with lenvatinib elevated the levels of pERK and pAKT. Conclusions: In conclusion, HBV infection increases resistance to both sorafenib and lenvatinib in hepatoma cells by influencing the cell cycle regulatory genes and critical signaling pathways. However, the resistance mechanisms likely differ between the two medications.
KW - HBV
KW - lenvatinib
KW - resistance
KW - sorafenib
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85210680663
U2 - 10.3390/cancers16223763
DO - 10.3390/cancers16223763
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 39594719
AN - SCOPUS:85210680663
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 16
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 22
M1 - 3763
ER -