TY - JOUR
T1 - Hemodynamic Changes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Among Heart Failure Patients With and Without Elevated Pulmonary Vascular Resistance
AU - Grupper, Avishay
AU - Mazin, Israel
AU - Faierstein, Kobi
AU - Kurnick, Adam
AU - Maor, Elad
AU - Elian, Dan
AU - Barbash, Israel M.
AU - Guetta, Victor
AU - Regev, Ehud
AU - Morgan, Avi
AU - Segev, Amit
AU - Lavee, Jacob
AU - Fefer, Paul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Grupper, Mazin, Faierstein, Kurnick, Maor, Elian, Barbash, Guetta, Regev, Morgan, Segev, Lavee and Fefer.
PY - 2022/4/26
Y1 - 2022/4/26
N2 - Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may reverse elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) which is associated with worse prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients. We aim to describe the temporal changes in hemodynamic parameters before and after LVAD implantation among patients with or without elevated PVR. Methods: HF patients who received continuous-flow LVAD (HeartMate 2&3) at a tertiary medical center and underwent right heart catheterization with PVR reversibility study before and after LVAD surgery. Patients were divided into 3 groups: normal PVR (<4WU); reversible PVR (initial PVR ≥4WU with positive reversibility); and non-reversible (persistent PVR ≥4WU). Results: Overall, 85 LVAD patients with a mean age of 58 years (IQR 49–64), 65 patients (76%) were male; 60 patients had normal PVR, 20 patients with reversible and 5 patients with non-reversible PVR pre-LVAD. All patients with elevated PVR (≥4WU) had higher pulmonary pressures (PP) and increased trans-pulmonary gradient (TPG) compared to patients with normal PVR (p < 0.05). Patients with non-reversible PVR were more likely to have a significantly lower baseline cardiac output (CO) compared to all other groups (p ≤ 0.02). Hemodynamic parameters and PVR post LVAD were similar in all study groups. Patients with baseline elevated PVR (reversible and non-reversible) demonstrated a significant improvement in PP and TPG compared to patients with normal baseline PVR (p ≤ 0.05). The improvement in CO and PVR post-LVAD in the non-reversible PVR group was significantly greater compared to all other groups (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between study groups in post LVAD and post heart transplantation course. Conclusion: Hemodynamic parameters improved after LVAD implantation, regardless of baseline PVR and reversibility, and enabled heart transplantation in patients who were ineligible due to non-reversible elevated PVR. Our findings suggest that mitigation of elevated non-reversible PVR is related to reduction in PP and increase in CO.
AB - Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may reverse elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) which is associated with worse prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients. We aim to describe the temporal changes in hemodynamic parameters before and after LVAD implantation among patients with or without elevated PVR. Methods: HF patients who received continuous-flow LVAD (HeartMate 2&3) at a tertiary medical center and underwent right heart catheterization with PVR reversibility study before and after LVAD surgery. Patients were divided into 3 groups: normal PVR (<4WU); reversible PVR (initial PVR ≥4WU with positive reversibility); and non-reversible (persistent PVR ≥4WU). Results: Overall, 85 LVAD patients with a mean age of 58 years (IQR 49–64), 65 patients (76%) were male; 60 patients had normal PVR, 20 patients with reversible and 5 patients with non-reversible PVR pre-LVAD. All patients with elevated PVR (≥4WU) had higher pulmonary pressures (PP) and increased trans-pulmonary gradient (TPG) compared to patients with normal PVR (p < 0.05). Patients with non-reversible PVR were more likely to have a significantly lower baseline cardiac output (CO) compared to all other groups (p ≤ 0.02). Hemodynamic parameters and PVR post LVAD were similar in all study groups. Patients with baseline elevated PVR (reversible and non-reversible) demonstrated a significant improvement in PP and TPG compared to patients with normal baseline PVR (p ≤ 0.05). The improvement in CO and PVR post-LVAD in the non-reversible PVR group was significantly greater compared to all other groups (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between study groups in post LVAD and post heart transplantation course. Conclusion: Hemodynamic parameters improved after LVAD implantation, regardless of baseline PVR and reversibility, and enabled heart transplantation in patients who were ineligible due to non-reversible elevated PVR. Our findings suggest that mitigation of elevated non-reversible PVR is related to reduction in PP and increase in CO.
KW - cardiac output
KW - heart transplantation
KW - non-reversible
KW - pulmonary hypertension
KW - pulmonary vascular resistance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138527788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fcvm.2022.875204
DO - 10.3389/fcvm.2022.875204
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 35557518
AN - SCOPUS:85138527788
SN - 2297-055X
VL - 9
JO - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
JF - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
M1 - 875204
ER -