Head-to-head comparison of in-house produced CD19 CAR-T cell in ALL and NHL patients

Orit Itzhaki, Elad Jacoby, Abraham Nissani, Michal Levi, Arnon Nagler, Adva Kubi, Karin Brezinger, Hadar Brayer, Li At Zeltzer, Meir Rozenbaum, Helly Vernitsky, Gal Markel, Amos Toren, Abraham Avigdor, Jacob Schachter, Michal J. Besser*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells demonstrate remarkable remission rates in pediatric and adult patients with refractory or relapsed (r/r) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). In 2016, we initiated a clinical trial with in-house produced CD19 CAR-T cells with a CD28 co-stimulatory domain. We analyzed, for the first time, differences in production features and phenotype between ALL and NHL patients. Methods Non-cryopreserved CAR-T cells were produced from patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells within 9 to 10 days. 93 patients with r/r ALL and NHL were enrolled under the same study. CAR-T cells of ALL and NHL patients were produced simultaneously, allowing the head-to-head comparison. Results All patients were heavily pretreated. Three patients dropped out from the study due to clinical deterioration (n=2) or production failure (n=1). Cells of ALL patients (n=37) expanded significantly better and contained more CAR-T cells than of NHL patients (n=53). Young age had a positive impact on the proliferation capacity. The infusion products from ALL patients contained significantly more naïve CAR-T cells and a significantly higher expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR3. PD-1, LAG-3, TIM-3, and CD28 were equally expressed. 100% of ALL patients and 94% of NHL patients received the target dose of 1×10e6 CAR-T/kg. The overall response rate was 84% (30/36) in ALL and 62% (32/52) in NHL. We further compared CAR-T cell infusion products to tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), another common type of T cell therapy, mainly clinically effective in solid tumors. CAR-T cells contained significantly more naïve T cells and central memory T cells and significantly less CCR5 compared to TIL infusion products. Conclusions The in-house production of CAR-T cells is highly efficient and fast. Clinical response rate is high. CAR-T cells can be successfully produced for 99% of patients in just 9 to 10 days. Cells derived from ALL patients demonstrate a higher proliferation rate and contain higher frequencies of CAR-T cells and naïve T cells than of NHL patients. In addition, understanding the differences between CAR-T and TIL infusion products, may provide an angle to develop CAR-T cells for the treatment of solid tumors in the future. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov; CAR-T: NCT02772198, First posted: May 13, 2016; TIL: NCT00287131, First posted: February 6, 2006.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere000148
JournalJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 8 Mar 2020

Funding

FundersFunder number
Sheba Medical Center

    Keywords

    • cell engineering
    • hematologic neoplasms
    • immunotherapy
    • t-lymphocytes
    • tumours

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Head-to-head comparison of in-house produced CD19 CAR-T cell in ALL and NHL patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this