Harmonization of the Bayer ADVIA Centaur and Abbott AxSYM automated B-type natriuretic peptide assay in patients on hemodialysis

Mira Barak, Ronit Weinberger, Jerom Marcusohn, Paul Froom*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

There are two fully automated high-throughput clinical instruments for brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) assays, the Bayer ADVIA Centaur assay, and the Abbott AxSYM assay. Although both recommend a cut-off value of 100 pg/mL, we are unaware of previous studies that have compared the unadjusted results of the two methods, required for proper evaluation of patients undergoing this test on different platforms. From 43 hemodialysis patients, 80 paired samples were collected by venipuncture into plastic evacuated tubes containing EDTA. The Bayer assay yielded lower values than the Abbott assay, with linear regression of 0.53 × Abbott assay (95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.56) being forced through 0, demonstrating an r2-value of 0.954. Regression for the Abbott assay was 1.79 × Bayer assay (95% CI, 1.69-1.89). The cut-off values for abnormal BNP results analyzed on the Abbott system are not identical to those on the Bayer system, and this needs to be taken into account when comparing studies on the clinical utility of these systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)554-556
Number of pages3
JournalClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Abbott
  • Automated
  • Bayer
  • Brain natriuretic peptide
  • Harmonization
  • Reference range

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Harmonization of the Bayer ADVIA Centaur and Abbott AxSYM automated B-type natriuretic peptide assay in patients on hemodialysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this