TY - JOUR
T1 - Halothane, isoflurane, and fentanyl increase the minimally effective defibrillation threshold of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
T2 - First report in humans
AU - Weinbroum, Avi A.
AU - Glick, Aharon
AU - Copperman, Yitzchak
AU - Yashar, Tamar
AU - Rudick, Valery
AU - Flaishon, Ron
PY - 2002/11/1
Y1 - 2002/11/1
N2 - Placing an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) involves the induction of ventricular fibrillation, whereupon the minimally effective defibrillation energy threshold (DFT) is determined. We evaluated the effects of 0.7% halothane, 1% isoflurane, or 1.5 μg/kg of IV fentanyl during N2O/oxygen-based general anesthesia (GA) or those of subcutaneous 1.5% lidocaine plus IV 0.35 mg/kg of propofol on the DFT during ICD implantation in humans (n = 20 per group). Thirty minutes after the first set of DFT measurements under such conditions, the inhaled anesthetics were withdrawn, and all three GA groups received fentanyl 1 μg/kg IV (second set). A third set was taken 30 min later, before the GA patients awakened and when only N2O/oxygen was delivered for GA. The lidocaine plus propofol patients were given the same IV propofol bolus 1 min before each fibrillation/defibrillation trial and at the same time points as the three GA groups. The first DFTs were 16.1 ± 2.2 J (halothane), 17.7 ± 2.7 J (isoflurane), 16.4 ± 2.9 J (fentanyl), and 12.9 ± 3.8 J (lidocaine plus propofol) (P = 0.01). The second set of DFTs were significantly lower than the first sets for the halothane (P = 0.01) and isoflurane (P = 0.02), but not the fentanyl or lidocaine plus propofol, regimens. The third DFTs were significantly (P < 0.01) lower than the first ones for the three GA groups, but not for the lidocaine plus propofol patients. Thus, halothane, isoflurane, and fentanyl increased DFT values during ICD implantation in humans, whereas lidocaine plus intermittent small-dose IV propofol minimized these thresholds.
AB - Placing an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) involves the induction of ventricular fibrillation, whereupon the minimally effective defibrillation energy threshold (DFT) is determined. We evaluated the effects of 0.7% halothane, 1% isoflurane, or 1.5 μg/kg of IV fentanyl during N2O/oxygen-based general anesthesia (GA) or those of subcutaneous 1.5% lidocaine plus IV 0.35 mg/kg of propofol on the DFT during ICD implantation in humans (n = 20 per group). Thirty minutes after the first set of DFT measurements under such conditions, the inhaled anesthetics were withdrawn, and all three GA groups received fentanyl 1 μg/kg IV (second set). A third set was taken 30 min later, before the GA patients awakened and when only N2O/oxygen was delivered for GA. The lidocaine plus propofol patients were given the same IV propofol bolus 1 min before each fibrillation/defibrillation trial and at the same time points as the three GA groups. The first DFTs were 16.1 ± 2.2 J (halothane), 17.7 ± 2.7 J (isoflurane), 16.4 ± 2.9 J (fentanyl), and 12.9 ± 3.8 J (lidocaine plus propofol) (P = 0.01). The second set of DFTs were significantly lower than the first sets for the halothane (P = 0.01) and isoflurane (P = 0.02), but not the fentanyl or lidocaine plus propofol, regimens. The third DFTs were significantly (P < 0.01) lower than the first ones for the three GA groups, but not for the lidocaine plus propofol patients. Thus, halothane, isoflurane, and fentanyl increased DFT values during ICD implantation in humans, whereas lidocaine plus intermittent small-dose IV propofol minimized these thresholds.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036828396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00000539-200211000-00004
DO - 10.1097/00000539-200211000-00004
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0036828396
SN - 0003-2999
VL - 95
SP - 1147
EP - 1153
JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia
JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia
IS - 5
ER -