Gushing Time: Modernity and the multiplicity of temporal homes

Eyal Chowers*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

According to some theorists (such as Agnes Heller) modern individuals no longer experience space as the anchor of their identity; they have become ‘geographically promiscuous’, changing their place of residency according to their personal circumstances and prospects for fulfillment. Instead, moderns have embraced the absolute present ’ the time of global culture ’ as the center of their identity. This article criticizes such claims. It suggests, first, that the absolute present is not the single temporal home available for late moderns, and that it coexists with singular conceptions of the past (semicyclicalism) and the profane (cosmopolitan) future as alternative homes; second, that in modernity spatial and temporal homelessness went hand in hand, rather than the former displacing the latter. Finally, it is suggested that the multiplicity of spatial and temporal homes available for late moderns calls for a flexible conception of selfhood, one that is able to incorporate this multiplicity and to welcome the ensuing homelessness within the self's own home(s).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-249
Number of pages17
JournalTime and Society
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2002

Keywords

  • absolute present
  • homelessness
  • profane future
  • semicyclicalism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gushing Time: Modernity and the multiplicity of temporal homes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this