TY - JOUR
T1 - 'Goodness' Concepts in the Study of Organizations
T2 - A Longitudinal Survey of Four Leading Journals
AU - Shenhav, Yehouda
AU - Alon, Sigal
AU - Shrum, Wesley
PY - 1994/9
Y1 - 1994/9
N2 - The study of organizational 'goodness' is examined in four leading organiza tional journals (American and European) spanning a period of 35 years. The survey of 349 articles shows that 'performance' and 'effectiveness' have been studied most frequently, while 'efficiency' and 'productivity' are rarely addressed. Since 1978, performance has become the single most dominant concept in the literature. Organization Studies was more likely to publish stud ies of effectiveness, whereas The Academy of Management Journal and The Administrative Science Quarterly were more likely to study performance. Only one fifth of the studies provide a theoretical definition of the concepts used, and the number of articles without a nominal definition has increased since 1975. The provision of definitions was more prominent in The Academy of Management Review and Organization Studies than in the other two journals. The results suggest that the literature does not offer a consistent approach to the study of organizational goodness and that measurement is largely erratic.
AB - The study of organizational 'goodness' is examined in four leading organiza tional journals (American and European) spanning a period of 35 years. The survey of 349 articles shows that 'performance' and 'effectiveness' have been studied most frequently, while 'efficiency' and 'productivity' are rarely addressed. Since 1978, performance has become the single most dominant concept in the literature. Organization Studies was more likely to publish stud ies of effectiveness, whereas The Academy of Management Journal and The Administrative Science Quarterly were more likely to study performance. Only one fifth of the studies provide a theoretical definition of the concepts used, and the number of articles without a nominal definition has increased since 1975. The provision of definitions was more prominent in The Academy of Management Review and Organization Studies than in the other two journals. The results suggest that the literature does not offer a consistent approach to the study of organizational goodness and that measurement is largely erratic.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965709641&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/017084069401500506
DO - 10.1177/017084069401500506
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84965709641
SN - 0170-8406
VL - 15
SP - 753
EP - 776
JO - Organization Studies
JF - Organization Studies
IS - 5
ER -