Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Versus Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Triggering in Fertility Preservation Cycles

Einat Haikin Herzberger*, Sabaa Knaneh, Hadar Amir, Adi Reches, Dalit Ben-Yosef, Yael Kalma, Foad Azem, Nivin Samara

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to study the efficacy of GnRH-a versus r-hCG triggering in patients who go through fertility preservation cycles. This retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary university–affiliated medical center. It includes 191 patients undergoing fertility preservation cycles between May 2013 and September 2018, in which ovulation was induced by either GnRH-a or r-hCG. Main outcome measures were number and rate of mature oocyte. Among treatment cycles with medical indication, GnRH agonist significantly increases the odds for high mature rate by 3.55 (1.30–9.66), while in treatment cycles with social indication, there is no significant effect of the triggering agent. An advantage for GnRH-a triggering was observed in medically indicated preservation cycles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3390-3396
Number of pages7
JournalReproductive Sciences
Volume28
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Keywords

  • Cancer patients
  • Elective fertility preservation
  • Onco-fertility preservation
  • Oocyte cryopreservation
  • Ovarian stimulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Versus Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Triggering in Fertility Preservation Cycles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this