TY - JOUR
T1 - Global-scale mapping of economic benefits from agricultural lands
T2 - Implications for conservation priorities
AU - Naidoo, Robin
AU - Iwamura, Takuya
N1 - Funding Information:
Comments from Andrew Balmford, Rhys Green, Kerrie Wilson, Paul Ferraro, Taylor Ricketts, Eric Dinerstein, John Morrison, Colby Loucks, and three anonymous reviewers improved an earlier version of the manuscript. We thank Navin Ramankutty for kindly providing us with data, Sam Buttrey for help with optimizations, and Kirk Hamilton and Giovanni Ruta for discussions. R.N. was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. T.I. was supported by a WWF Science Internship.
PY - 2007/11
Y1 - 2007/11
N2 - Research in systematic conservation planning has focused heavily on biological considerations, even though a growing number of studies demonstrate that integrating economic costs into the planning process markedly increases the efficiency of resulting plans. At the global scale, the availability of biodiversity maps is increasing, but analogous maps for economic factors that affect biodiversity conservation are rare, and no study has examined global conservation planning at high resolution using both biodiversity and cost information. Here, we integrate spatial information on crop productivity, livestock density, and prices to produce a global map of the gross economic rents from agricultural lands. We then illustrate the importance of including such opportunity costs in global planning for the conservation of endemic vertebrate species. Plans that consider costs represent endemic species at 10-33% of the opportunity cost of plans that do not, and produce priority sets that diverge from existing schemes. Given scarce resources and the great cost-effectiveness of plans that consider both biodiversity and costs, mapping of the economic costs of conservation should receive similar levels of research attention as mapping of biodiversity.
AB - Research in systematic conservation planning has focused heavily on biological considerations, even though a growing number of studies demonstrate that integrating economic costs into the planning process markedly increases the efficiency of resulting plans. At the global scale, the availability of biodiversity maps is increasing, but analogous maps for economic factors that affect biodiversity conservation are rare, and no study has examined global conservation planning at high resolution using both biodiversity and cost information. Here, we integrate spatial information on crop productivity, livestock density, and prices to produce a global map of the gross economic rents from agricultural lands. We then illustrate the importance of including such opportunity costs in global planning for the conservation of endemic vertebrate species. Plans that consider costs represent endemic species at 10-33% of the opportunity cost of plans that do not, and produce priority sets that diverge from existing schemes. Given scarce resources and the great cost-effectiveness of plans that consider both biodiversity and costs, mapping of the economic costs of conservation should receive similar levels of research attention as mapping of biodiversity.
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Conservation planning
KW - Costs
KW - Reserve design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34948850293&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.025
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.025
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:34948850293
SN - 0006-3207
VL - 140
SP - 40
EP - 49
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
IS - 1-2
ER -