Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

GBD 2016 Risk Factors Collaborators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2069 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016 (GBD 2016) provides a comprehensive assessment of risk factor exposure and attributable burden of disease. By providing estimates over a long time series, this study can monitor risk exposure trends critical to health surveillance and inform policy debates on the importance of addressing risks in context. Methods: We used the comparative risk assessment framework developed for previous iterations of GBD to estimate levels and trends in exposure, attributable deaths, and attributable disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), by age group, sex, year, and location for 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks from 1990 to 2016. This study included 481 risk-outcome pairs that met the GBD study criteria for convincing or probable evidence of causation. We extracted relative risk (RR) and exposure estimates from 22 717 randomised controlled trials, cohorts, pooled cohorts, household surveys, census data, satellite data, and other sources, according to the GBD 2016 source counting methods. Using the counterfactual scenario of theoretical minimum risk exposure level (TMREL), we estimated the portion of deaths and DALYs that could be attributed to a given risk. Finally, we explored four drivers of trends in attributable burden: population growth, population ageing, trends in risk exposure, and all other factors combined. Findings: Since 1990, exposure increased significantly for 30 risks, did not change significantly for four risks, and decreased significantly for 31 risks. Among risks that are leading causes of burden of disease, child growth failure and household air pollution showed the most significant declines, while metabolic risks, such as body-mass index and high fasting plasma glucose, showed significant increases. In 2016, at Level 3 of the hierarchy, the three leading risk factors in terms of attributable DALYs at the global level for men were smoking (124.1 million DALYs [95% UI 111.2 million to 137.0 million]), high systolic blood pressure (122.2 million DALYs [110.3 million to 133.3 million], and low birthweight and short gestation (83.0 million DALYs [78.3 million to 87.7 million]), and for women, were high systolic blood pressure (89.9 million DALYs [80.9 million to 98.2 million]), high body-mass index (64.8 million DALYs [44.4 million to 87.6 million]), and high fasting plasma glucose (63.8 million DALYs [53.2 million to 76.3 million]). In 2016 in 113 countries, the leading risk factor in terms of attributable DALYs was a metabolic risk factor. Smoking remained among the leading five risk factors for DALYs for 109 countries, while low birthweight and short gestation was the leading risk factor for DALYs in 38 countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. In terms of important drivers of change in trends of burden attributable to risk factors, between 2006 and 2016 exposure to risks explains an 9.3% (6.9-11.6) decline in deaths and a 10.8% (8.3-13.1) decrease in DALYs at the global level, while population ageing accounts for 14.9% (12.7-17.5) of deaths and 6.2% (3.9-8.7) of DALYs, and population growth for 12.4% (10.1-14.9) of deaths and 12.4% (10.1-14.9) of DALYs. The largest contribution of trends in risk exposure to disease burden is seen between ages 1 year and 4 years, where a decline of 27.3% (24.9-29.7) of the change in DALYs between 2006 and 2016 can be attributed to declines in exposure to risks. Interpretation: Increasingly detailed understanding of the trends in risk exposure and the RRs for each risk-outcome pair provide insights into both the magnitude of health loss attributable to risks and how modification of risk exposure has contributed to health trends. Metabolic risks warrant particular policy attention, due to their large contribution to global disease burden, increasing trends, and variable patterns across countries at the same level of development. GBD 2016 findings show that, while it has huge potential to improve health, risk modification has played a relatively small part in the past decade.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1345-1422
Number of pages78
JournalThe Lancet
Volume390
Issue number10100
DOIs
StatePublished - 16 Sep 2017
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social
Savient and Takeda
Kyowa Hakko Kirin
German National Cohort Study
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
GATS
National Council on Disability
Economic Growth Center, Yale University
National Research Foundation of Korea
ISCIII-FEDER
National Kidney Foundation
South African Medical Research Council
National Science Foundation
ERDF-FEDER
General Branch Evaluation and Promotion of Health Research
ADC Foundation
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Horizon Pharmaceuticals
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
American College of Rheumatology
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Foundation for Education and European Culture
European Commission
Wellcome Trust
Department of Biotechnology, India Alliance
Global Adult Tobacco Survey
Competence Cluster for Nutrition and Cardiovascular Health
George Institute for Global Health and career transition grants from High Blood Pressure Research Council
Wellcome Trust DBT
Public Health England
CONADIC
Bundesbehörden der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
Fukuda Denshi
European Regional Development Fund
Public Health Institute
The World Academy of Sciences
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Horizon 2020
Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation GE Safe Surgery 2020
World Health Organization
UK Research and Innovation
Seventh Framework Programme261982, 211909, 227822
Sara Borrell postdoctoral programmeCD15/00019
Economic and Social Research CouncilES/J023299/1
Medical Research CouncilMR/K013351/1, MC_U147585819, MC_UU_12011/2, MC_UP_A620_1014, MC_UP_A620_1015, G0400491, MC_UU_12011/1, MC_UU_12017/13, MC_UU_12017/15
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesR01-AI112339, R01-AI124389, D43-TW009775
National Institute on AgingP30_AG12815, U01AG009740, IAG_BSR06-11, P01_AG08291, R01AG030153, R21AG032572, P01_AG005842, Y1-AG-4553-01, OGHA_04-064, R03AG043052, HHSN271201300071C, R21_AG025169, U01_AG09740-13S2
National Heart Foundation of Australia201900, 100864
Qatar National Research FundNPRP 9-040-3-008
Ministry of Education Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia has co-financed Serbian part of Mihajlo JakovljevicOI 175 014
Scottish Government Chief Scientist OfficeSPHSU13 & SPHSU15
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme703226
University of MichiganP01-HD31921
Not added175014
Sixth Framework ProgrammeCIT4-CT-2006-028812, RII-CT-2006-062193, CIT5-CT-2005-028857
National Institutes of HealthR01-HD084233
National Health and Medical Research CouncilPROMETEOII/2015/021, 1042600, 1037196
Spanish governmentU54HG007479, RETIC REDINREN RD016/0019
Public Health Agency of CanadaIII45005
Chinese Academy of SciencesAPP1056929
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science15K08762
National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaR01HD087993, 71490732, 71233001, U01AI096299
Bill and Melinda Gates FoundationOPP1132415, OPP1093011, OPP1119467, OPP1106023
National Rosacea SocietySCAF/15/02
Fifth Framework ProgrammeQLK6-CT-2001-00360
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung01ER1511/D
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegrePI15/00862, CP13/00150
Generalitat ValencianaPI14/00894, PIE14/00031
Fundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUID/Multi/50016/2013, SFRH/BPD/92934/2013
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentP01HD031921

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this