Genome content predicts the carbon catabolic preferences of heterotrophic bacteria

Matti Gralka*, Shaul Pollak, Otto X. Cordero*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Heterotrophic bacteria—bacteria that utilize organic carbon sources—are taxonomically and functionally diverse across environments. It is challenging to map metabolic interactions and niches within microbial communities due to the large number of metabolites that could serve as potential carbon and energy sources for heterotrophs. Whether their metabolic niches can be understood using general principles, such as a small number of simplified metabolic categories, is unclear. Here we perform high-throughput metabolic profiling of 186 marine heterotrophic bacterial strains cultured in media containing one of 135 carbon substrates to determine growth rates, lag times and yields. We show that, despite high variability at all levels of taxonomy, the catabolic niches of heterotrophic bacteria can be understood in terms of their preference for either glycolytic (sugars) or gluconeogenic (amino and organic acids) carbon sources. This preference is encoded by the total number of genes found in pathways that feed into the two modes of carbon utilization and can be predicted using a simple linear model based on gene counts. This allows for coarse-grained descriptions of microbial communities in terms of prevalent modes of carbon catabolism. The sugar–acid preference is also associated with genomic GC content and thus with the carbon–nitrogen requirements of their encoded proteome. Our work reveals how the evolution of bacterial genomes is structured by fundamental constraints rooted in metabolism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1799-1808
Number of pages10
JournalNature Microbiology
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 2023
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Genome content predicts the carbon catabolic preferences of heterotrophic bacteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this