Gastrografin for mechanical partial, small bowel obstruction due to adhesions

A. Assalia*, D. Kopelman, H. Bahous, Y. Klein, M. Hashmonai

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

The therapeutic effect of gastrografin is occasionally mentioned in the literature. However, this effect has not been objectively evaluated. We studied prospectively the effect of Gastrografin in cases of adhesive, simple, partial, small bowel obstruction (SBO) compared to conventional management. During 3 years, a total of 137 episodes of simple, partial SBO in 127 patients (10 recurrent episodes) were treated. The episodes were randomized into a control group (80 episodes) treated conventionally, and a trial group (77 episodes), which received in addition 100 ml of Gastrografin administered through the nasogastric tube. The two groups were well-matched with regard to age, gender, weight, medical and surgical background and duration of complaints before admission. Time to first stool and resolution of obstruction, complications, need for surgery, and hospital stay were noted. Mean time to first stool was significantly shorter in the trial group: 6.2 ± 3.9 hours vs 23.5 ± 12.7 (p<.0001). Mean hospital stay for unoperated patients was also shorter in the trial group: 2.7 ± 2 days vs 5.5 ± 2 days, (p<.0001). In addition, significantly fewer episodes in the trial group required operation, 10.4 vs 26.7% (p<0.013). 1 patient in each group died following operation. There were no Gastrografin-related complications and it was effective and safe for adhesive, partial, simple SBO. It significantly speeds resolution of obstruction, reduces the need for operation, and shortens convalescence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)629-633+679
JournalHarefuah
Volume132
Issue number9
StatePublished - 1 May 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gastrografin for mechanical partial, small bowel obstruction due to adhesions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this