Games of luck and games of chance: The effect of luck- versus chance-orientation on gambling decisions

Nehemia Friedland*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Chance and luck are conceived as two distinct causal agents that effect different results. The present study examined the proposition that persons who habitually attribute the outcome of random events to chance (chance-oriented persons) and those who prefer to attribute such outcomes to luck (luck-oriented persons) cope differently with decision making under uncertainty. Chance-oriented persons decide according to given or estimated odds that define the decision problem. Luck-oriented persons, on the other hand, rely on self-attributions of personal luck, and ignore the probabilities of decision outcomes. The hypothesized qualitative difference between the approaches of chance- and luck-oriented persons to decision making under uncertainty was supported substantially by the findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-179
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Behavioral Decision Making
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

Keywords

  • Chance
  • Gambling decisions
  • Luck

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Games of luck and games of chance: The effect of luck- versus chance-orientation on gambling decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this