TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional status of hearing aids in bilateral-bimodal users
AU - Yehudai, Noam
AU - Shpak, Talma
AU - Most, Tova
AU - Luntz, Michal
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - Objective: To assess the functional status of the hearing aid (HA) in bilateral-bimodal users, in whom HA monitoring is often neglected because fitting efforts are focused on the cochlear implant (CI). Also, to define an audiometric pattern of residual hearing that might explain why, despite nonoptimal bimodal fitting, certain cochlear implantees still opt to use a HA. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: Ambulatory care clinic. Participants: Experienced bimodal (CI/HA) adult users (N = 31) who use their HA during most of their waking hours. HA settings were required to meet a selected prescriptive (NAL-NL1) electroacoustical Verifit Speechmap target at low frequencies using the simulated real-ear mode. Intervention: After initial evaluation, HAs that did not meet the Speechmap target underwent appropriate fitting and reevaluation. Main Outcome Measure(s): Number of patients whoseHAs met the defined Speechmap criteria after refitting; residual hearing levels in patients who achieved optimal bimodal fitting and in those who did not. Results: At initial evaluation, the HA in 25 (81%) of the 31 participants was malfunctioning or poorly tuned. After HA replacement or retuning, 19 participants (61%) met the Speechmap targets, and 12 (39%) did not. However, the 2 groups had similar mean levels of unaided and aided residual hearing thresholds at 250 or 500 Hz. Conclusion: To maximize the benefit for bilateral-bimodal users, specific guidelines must be established also for fitting of their HAs. The focus should be on achieving the maximum amplification possible at low frequencies.
AB - Objective: To assess the functional status of the hearing aid (HA) in bilateral-bimodal users, in whom HA monitoring is often neglected because fitting efforts are focused on the cochlear implant (CI). Also, to define an audiometric pattern of residual hearing that might explain why, despite nonoptimal bimodal fitting, certain cochlear implantees still opt to use a HA. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: Ambulatory care clinic. Participants: Experienced bimodal (CI/HA) adult users (N = 31) who use their HA during most of their waking hours. HA settings were required to meet a selected prescriptive (NAL-NL1) electroacoustical Verifit Speechmap target at low frequencies using the simulated real-ear mode. Intervention: After initial evaluation, HAs that did not meet the Speechmap target underwent appropriate fitting and reevaluation. Main Outcome Measure(s): Number of patients whoseHAs met the defined Speechmap criteria after refitting; residual hearing levels in patients who achieved optimal bimodal fitting and in those who did not. Results: At initial evaluation, the HA in 25 (81%) of the 31 participants was malfunctioning or poorly tuned. After HA replacement or retuning, 19 participants (61%) met the Speechmap targets, and 12 (39%) did not. However, the 2 groups had similar mean levels of unaided and aided residual hearing thresholds at 250 or 500 Hz. Conclusion: To maximize the benefit for bilateral-bimodal users, specific guidelines must be established also for fitting of their HAs. The focus should be on achieving the maximum amplification possible at low frequencies.
KW - Bimodal users
KW - Functional status
KW - Hearing aids
KW - Residual hearing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879240353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182898131
DO - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182898131
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 23640089
AN - SCOPUS:84879240353
SN - 1531-7129
VL - 34
SP - 675
EP - 681
JO - Otology and Neurotology
JF - Otology and Neurotology
IS - 4
ER -