From Argument to Assertion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Acceptance or rejection of factual assertions is a far more important process than logical validation of arguments. Not only are assertions more persuasive than arguments; this is desirable, since we want our beliefs and actions to be reasonable and not just rational. When do we resort to argument? Real speeches heavy on arguments aim to present the speaker as calm, serious, and knowledgeable. In public life, one argues not in order to demonstrate the claim for which one is arguing, but to show that one shares the common prejudices or values that appear in the presuppositions and conclusions of one's argument, and to demonstrate mastery of the subject matter by displaying relevant knowledge in coherently organized detail. Arguing is thus a way of presenting facts and principles so as to show one's character as worthy of trust.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)387-396
Number of pages10
JournalArgumentation
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009

Keywords

  • Aristotle
  • Assertion
  • Enthymeme
  • Facts
  • Perelman
  • Reasonableness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From Argument to Assertion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this