TY - CHAP
T1 - Forgiving God A Jewish Perspective on Evil and Suffering
AU - Verbin, N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2007 Brill. All rights reserved.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - This paper proposes forgiveness—human forgiveness for divine abuse—as a religious response to the suffering of the innocent. It is divided into three sections. The first section examines the logical space within which forgiveness is possible. It shows that forgiveness presupposes the possibility of a meaningful relationship between valuable moral agents who have certain fundamental rights and who may seriously compromise each other’s happiness. The second section discusses the nature of forgiveness, arguing that forgiveness is distinguished from reconciliation and has to do primarily with the overcoming of one’s resentment of one’s assailant, which does not require the assailant’s repentance or a more favorable view of one’s assailant. The third section discusses Job’s relationship with God as an instance of a victim‐assailant relationship and shows that, while Job transcended his resentment toward God and forgave God for the unjust suffering that He had inflicted on him, he was not willing to be reconciled with Him. Forgiveness, even in cases lacking divine response, is thus presented as a viable option for the abused believer for sustaining a minimal relationship with God.
AB - This paper proposes forgiveness—human forgiveness for divine abuse—as a religious response to the suffering of the innocent. It is divided into three sections. The first section examines the logical space within which forgiveness is possible. It shows that forgiveness presupposes the possibility of a meaningful relationship between valuable moral agents who have certain fundamental rights and who may seriously compromise each other’s happiness. The second section discusses the nature of forgiveness, arguing that forgiveness is distinguished from reconciliation and has to do primarily with the overcoming of one’s resentment of one’s assailant, which does not require the assailant’s repentance or a more favorable view of one’s assailant. The third section discusses Job’s relationship with God as an instance of a victim‐assailant relationship and shows that, while Job transcended his resentment toward God and forgave God for the unjust suffering that He had inflicted on him, he was not willing to be reconciled with Him. Forgiveness, even in cases lacking divine response, is thus presented as a viable option for the abused believer for sustaining a minimal relationship with God.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178887165&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/9789401204620_014
DO - 10.1163/9789401204620_014
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.chapter???
AN - SCOPUS:85178887165
T3 - Currents of Encounter
SP - 201
EP - 216
BT - Currents of Encounter
PB - Brill Academic Publishers
ER -