Abstract
Objective: Elective neck dissection (END) improves outcomes among clinically node-negative patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). However, END is of questionable value, considering the potentially higher comorbidities and operative risks in elderly patients. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients older than 65 years of age who were treated for OCSCC at a tertiary care centre between 2005 and 2020 was conducted. Results: Fifty-three patients underwent primary tumour resection alone, and 71 had simultaneous END. Most primary tumours were located on the mobile tongue. The patients who did not undergo END had a higher mean age (81.2 vs. 75.1 years, P < 0.00001), significantly shorter surgeries, and shorter hospitalizations. Occult cervical metastases were found in 24% of the patients who underwent END. The two groups showed no significant differences in overall survival or recurrence rates. Similar results were shown in a subpopulation analysis of patients older than 75 years. Conclusion: Foregoing END in elderly patients with no clinical evidence of neck metastases did not result in lower survival rates or higher recurrence rates.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 128-139 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | ANZ Journal of Surgery |
Volume | 94 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2024 |
Keywords
- aged
- carcinoma
- elective neck dissection
- humans
- mouth neoplasms
- old age
- retrospective
- squamous cell
- squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck
- survival rate