TY - JOUR
T1 - Follow-up of ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma
T2 - The value of physical examination in patients with pretreatment elevated CA125 levels
AU - Menczer, Joseph
AU - Chetrit, Angela
AU - Sadetzki, Siegal
AU - Golan, Abraham
AU - Levy, Tally
PY - 2006/10
Y1 - 2006/10
N2 - Objective.: To assess the value of routine periodic physical examination in the follow-up of ovarian (OvC) and primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) patients with pretreatment elevated CA125 levels. Methods.: Included were patients who had a pretreatment serum CA125 level above normal limits, had completed initial treatment, were in complete clinical remission on completion of the initial treatment and routinely attended the gynecologic oncology outpatient clinic. Recurrence was diagnosed when at least one of the following criteria was abnormal: symptoms, physical examination or elevated serum CA125 levels. Results.: Of 69 patients, a recurrence was diagnosed in 43. Abnormal physical examination for diagnosis of recurrence yielded a sensitivity rate of only 34.9%. The diagnosis of recurrence was based on an abnormal physical examination alone in 2 (4.6%) patients. Conclusion.: In OvC and PPC patients with elevated pretreatment CA125 levels, physical examination has a limited impact on the diagnosis of recurrence.
AB - Objective.: To assess the value of routine periodic physical examination in the follow-up of ovarian (OvC) and primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) patients with pretreatment elevated CA125 levels. Methods.: Included were patients who had a pretreatment serum CA125 level above normal limits, had completed initial treatment, were in complete clinical remission on completion of the initial treatment and routinely attended the gynecologic oncology outpatient clinic. Recurrence was diagnosed when at least one of the following criteria was abnormal: symptoms, physical examination or elevated serum CA125 levels. Results.: Of 69 patients, a recurrence was diagnosed in 43. Abnormal physical examination for diagnosis of recurrence yielded a sensitivity rate of only 34.9%. The diagnosis of recurrence was based on an abnormal physical examination alone in 2 (4.6%) patients. Conclusion.: In OvC and PPC patients with elevated pretreatment CA125 levels, physical examination has a limited impact on the diagnosis of recurrence.
KW - CA125
KW - Epithelial ovarian carcinoma
KW - Follow-up
KW - Physical examination
KW - Primary peritoneal carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748704330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.02.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.02.005
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:33748704330
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 103
SP - 137
EP - 140
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 1
ER -