Follow-up of children with celiac disease - Lost in translation?

Yael Mozer-Glassberg, Noam Zevit, Yoram Rosenbach, Corina Hartman, Sara Morgenstern, Raanan Shamir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Celiac disease (CD) is a prevalent condition with a broad spectrum of presentations requiring a lifelong gluten-free diet (GFD). Our aims were to examine the presentation and adherence to a GFD as well as the adequacy of follow-up of children diagnosed with CD at a tertiary referral center. Methods: A retrospective electronic chart review of pediatric patients suspected of CD (n = 581) who were seen at our institute between January 1999 and December 2008 was performed. Results: 387 children were diagnosed with CD (F/M ratio of 1.54, median age: 6.25 years). Presenting symptoms were iron deficiency anemia (n = 82, 34%), short stature (n = 59, 24.5%) and abdominal pain (n = 59, 24.5%). In 63 patients (16.3%) an associated autoimmune disease was recorded. Only 42.7% of the patients (165/387) had regular out-patient gastroenterologist visits; 22% (86/387) were followed by their primary care physician. Over 35% (136/387) were completely lost to follow-up. Negative serology on follow-up was present in 91% of the CD patients(150/165) followed at our center in comparison to 70% (60/86) in those followed up by their primary physician (p = 0.0002). Conclusions: At least in our referral center, follow-up of children diagnosed with CD is far from satisfactory. Initiatives aimed at improving adherence to regular follow-up are needed as this intervention is associated with a significant increase in patient compliance with a long-term GFD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-287
Number of pages5
JournalDigestion
Volume83
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Keywords

  • Celiac disease
  • Children
  • Follow-up
  • Gluten-free diet

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Follow-up of children with celiac disease - Lost in translation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this