TY - JOUR
T1 - Fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and next-generation sequencing for detection of EML4-ALK rearrangement in lung cancer
AU - Pekar-Zlotin, Marina
AU - Hirsch, Fred R.
AU - Soussan-Gutman, Lior
AU - Ilouze, Maya
AU - Dvir, Addie
AU - Boyle, Theresa
AU - Wynes, Murry
AU - Miller, Vincent A.
AU - Lipson, Doron
AU - Palmer, Gary A.
AU - Ali, Siraj M.
AU - Dekel, Shlomi
AU - Brenner, Ronen
AU - Bunn, Paul A.
AU - Peled, Nir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© AlphaMed Press 2015.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Background. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved method for detecting EML4-ALK rearrangement is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); however, data supporting the use of immunohistochemistry(IHC) for that purpose are accumulating. Previous studies that compared FISH and IHC considered FISH the gold standard, but none compared data with the results of next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. Materials and Methods. We studied FISH and IHC (D5F3 antibody) systematically for EML4-ALK rearrangement in 51 lung adenocarcinoma patients, followed by NGS in case of discordance. Results. Of 51 patients, 4 were positive with FISH (7.8%), and 8 were positive with IHC (15.7%). Three were positive with both. NGS confirmed that four of the five patients who were positive with IHC and negative with FISH were positive for ALK. Two were treated by crizotinib, with progression-free survival of 18 and 6 months. Considering NGS as the most accurate test, the sensitivity and specificity were 42.9% and 97.7%, respectively, for FISH and 100% and 97.7%, respectively, for IHC. Conclusion.The FISH-based method of detecting EML4-ALK rearrangement in lung cancer may miss a significant number of patients who could benefit from targeted ALK therapy. Screening for EML4-ALK rearrangement by IHC should be strongly considered, and NGS is recommended in borderline cases.Two patients who were negative with FISH and positive with IHC were treated with crizotinib and responded to therapy.
AB - Background. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved method for detecting EML4-ALK rearrangement is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); however, data supporting the use of immunohistochemistry(IHC) for that purpose are accumulating. Previous studies that compared FISH and IHC considered FISH the gold standard, but none compared data with the results of next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. Materials and Methods. We studied FISH and IHC (D5F3 antibody) systematically for EML4-ALK rearrangement in 51 lung adenocarcinoma patients, followed by NGS in case of discordance. Results. Of 51 patients, 4 were positive with FISH (7.8%), and 8 were positive with IHC (15.7%). Three were positive with both. NGS confirmed that four of the five patients who were positive with IHC and negative with FISH were positive for ALK. Two were treated by crizotinib, with progression-free survival of 18 and 6 months. Considering NGS as the most accurate test, the sensitivity and specificity were 42.9% and 97.7%, respectively, for FISH and 100% and 97.7%, respectively, for IHC. Conclusion.The FISH-based method of detecting EML4-ALK rearrangement in lung cancer may miss a significant number of patients who could benefit from targeted ALK therapy. Screening for EML4-ALK rearrangement by IHC should be strongly considered, and NGS is recommended in borderline cases.Two patients who were negative with FISH and positive with IHC were treated with crizotinib and responded to therapy.
KW - EML4-ALK
KW - Fluorescence in situ hybridization
KW - Immunohistochemistry
KW - Next-generation sequencing
KW - Non-small cell lung cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925411861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0389
DO - 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0389
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 25721120
AN - SCOPUS:84925411861
SN - 1083-7159
VL - 20
SP - 316
EP - 322
JO - Oncologist
JF - Oncologist
IS - 3
ER -