TY - JOUR
T1 - Fluid management and strength postsimulated use of primary and secondary dressings for treating diabetic foot ulcers
T2 - Robotic phantom studies
AU - Lustig, Adi
AU - Gefen, Amit
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Non-offloaded diabetic heel ulcers and the wound dressings used to treat them may be subjected to considerable bodyweight forces. A novel robotic foot phantom with a diabetic heel ulcer was designed and constructed to test the combined performances of applied primary and secondary dressings, in simulated non-offloaded (standing) and offloaded (supine) postures. We specifically compared the performances of the primary Exufiber dressing (Mölnlycke Health Care) combined with the secondary Mepilex Border Flex dressing (Mölnlycke) against a corresponding pair from an alternative manufacturer. Fluid retention and distribution between the primary and secondary dressings of each pair were determined using weight tests, and mechanical strength of the primary dressings was further measured postsimulated use through tensile testing. The Exufiber and Mepilex Border Flex pair performed similarly in the two simulated postures (retention = ~97%), whereas the comparator pair exhibited a 13%-decrease in retention for a supine to standing transition. Furthermore, the Exufiber dressing delivered up to 2-times more fluid to its paired secondary dressing and endured 1.7-times greater strain energy than the corresponding primary dressing before failure occurred. The present robotic foot phantom and associated methods are versatile and suitable for testing any dressing, in consideration of the relevant clinical factors and practice.
AB - Non-offloaded diabetic heel ulcers and the wound dressings used to treat them may be subjected to considerable bodyweight forces. A novel robotic foot phantom with a diabetic heel ulcer was designed and constructed to test the combined performances of applied primary and secondary dressings, in simulated non-offloaded (standing) and offloaded (supine) postures. We specifically compared the performances of the primary Exufiber dressing (Mölnlycke Health Care) combined with the secondary Mepilex Border Flex dressing (Mölnlycke) against a corresponding pair from an alternative manufacturer. Fluid retention and distribution between the primary and secondary dressings of each pair were determined using weight tests, and mechanical strength of the primary dressings was further measured postsimulated use through tensile testing. The Exufiber and Mepilex Border Flex pair performed similarly in the two simulated postures (retention = ~97%), whereas the comparator pair exhibited a 13%-decrease in retention for a supine to standing transition. Furthermore, the Exufiber dressing delivered up to 2-times more fluid to its paired secondary dressing and endured 1.7-times greater strain energy than the corresponding primary dressing before failure occurred. The present robotic foot phantom and associated methods are versatile and suitable for testing any dressing, in consideration of the relevant clinical factors and practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107973692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/iwj.13631
DO - 10.1111/iwj.13631
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34132486
AN - SCOPUS:85107973692
SN - 1742-4801
VL - 19
SP - 305
EP - 315
JO - International Wound Journal
JF - International Wound Journal
IS - 2
ER -