Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

  • Saad Z. Usmani*
  • , Hareth Nahi
  • , Wojciech Legiec
  • , Sebastian Grosicki
  • , Vladimir Vorobyev
  • , Ivan Spicka
  • , Vania Hungria
  • , Sibirina Korenkova
  • , Nizar J. Bahlis
  • , Max Flogegard
  • , Joan Bladé
  • , Philippe Moreau
  • , Martin Kaiser
  • , Shinsuke Iida
  • , Jacob Laubach
  • , Hila Magen
  • , Michele Cavo
  • , Cyrille Hulin
  • , Darrell White
  • , Valerio De Stefano
  • Kristen Lantz, Lisa O'Rourke, Christoph Heuck, Maria Delioukina, Xiang Qin, Ivo Nnane, Ming Qi, Maria Victoria Mateos
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Ziema Lubelska Oncological Center
  • Medical University of Silesia in Katowice
  • S. P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital
  • Charles University
  • Clinica São Germano
  • Kyiv Center for Bone Marrow Transplantation
  • University of Calgary
  • Falun Central Hospital
  • University of Barcelona
  • CHU de Nantes
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  • Nagoya City University
  • Harvard University
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S. Orsola - Malpighi
  • Hôpital du Haut-Lévêque
  • Dalhousie University
  • Catholic University of Sacred Heart
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • CSIC

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

56 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the primary analysis of the phase III COLUMBA study, daratumumab by subcutaneous administration (DARA SC) demonstrated non-inferiority to intravenous administration (DARA IV) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we report the final analysis of efficacy and safety from COLUMBA after a median of 29.3 months follow-up (additional 21.8 months after the primary analysis). In total, 522 patients were randomized (DARA SC, n=263; DARA IV, n=259). With longer follow-up, DARA SC and DARA IV continued to show consistent efficacy and maximum trough daratumumab concentration as compared with the primary analysis. The overall response rate was 43.7% for DARA SC and 39.8% for DARA IV. The maximum mean (standard deviation [SD]) trough concentration (cycle 3, day 1 pre-dose) of serum DARA was 581 (SD, 315) µg/mL for DARA SC and 496 (SD, 231) µg/mL for DARA IV. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months for DARA SC and 6.1 months for DARA IV; median overall survival was 28.2 months and 25.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 50.8% of patients in the DARA SC group and 52.7% in the DARA IV group; the most common (≥10%) were thrombocytopenia (DARA SC, 14.2%; DARA IV, 13.6%), anemia (13.8%; 15.1%), and neutropenia (13.1%; 7.8%). The safety profile remained consistent with the primary analysis after longer follow-up. In summary, DARA SC and DARA IV continue to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety, with a low rate of infusion-related reactions (12.7% vs. 34.5%, respectively) and shorter administration time (3-5 minutes vs. 3-7 hours) supporting DARA SC as a preferable therapeutic choice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2408-2417
Number of pages10
JournalHaematologica
Volume107
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2022

Funding

Funders
Janssen Research and Development

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this