TY - JOUR
T1 - Fetal posterior fossa dimensions
T2 - Normal and anomalous development assessed in mid-sagittal cranial plane by three-dimensional multiplanar sonography
AU - Leibovitz, Z.
AU - Haratz, K. K.
AU - Malinger, G.
AU - Shapiro, I.
AU - Pressman, C.
PY - 2014/2
Y1 - 2014/2
N2 - Objectives To construct nomograms of the dimensions of the fetal posterior fossa (PF), assessed in the mid-sagittal plane in the second and third trimesters, and to assess how measurements from fetuses with PF abnormalities deviate from our normal ranges. Methods This was a prospective cross-sectional study of 378 healthy fetuses in low-risk singleton pregnancies between 15 and 35 weeks. PF size was evaluated in the mid-sagittal plane of the fetal head using three-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction (3D-MPR). The borders of the PF were defined from the clivus to the tentorium (clivotentorial distance, CTD) and from the occipital bone to the level of the upper mesencephalic edge (tecto-occipital distance, TOD), and the posterior fossa area (PFA) and perimeter (PFP) were assessed. Growth charts were produced. Thirty-nine fetuses diagnosed with PF malformations were analyzed by calculating the z-scores of PFA, PFP, TOD and CTD, relative to the developed nomograms. Results Of the 378 healthy fetuses initially included, there were 281 with adequate visualization of the PF borders; i.e. PF mid-sagittal plane morphometry was feasible in 74.3% of cases. There was a linear relationship between each of PFA, PFP, TOD and CTD, and gestational age, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.97, 0.97, 0.96 and 0.95, respectively (P < 0.001 for each). Chiari II malformation (CM-II) and Dandy-Walker malformation (DWM) were associated with the greatest difference in PF size compared with normal; PFA z-scores exceeded 2.6 in all five DWM cases and were below -2.66 in all 11 CM-II cases. Conclusions Sonographic evaluation of fetal PF size in the mid-sagittal plane is feasible. Our constructed nomograms provide reference data that may be helpful when evaluating PF congenital malformations.
AB - Objectives To construct nomograms of the dimensions of the fetal posterior fossa (PF), assessed in the mid-sagittal plane in the second and third trimesters, and to assess how measurements from fetuses with PF abnormalities deviate from our normal ranges. Methods This was a prospective cross-sectional study of 378 healthy fetuses in low-risk singleton pregnancies between 15 and 35 weeks. PF size was evaluated in the mid-sagittal plane of the fetal head using three-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction (3D-MPR). The borders of the PF were defined from the clivus to the tentorium (clivotentorial distance, CTD) and from the occipital bone to the level of the upper mesencephalic edge (tecto-occipital distance, TOD), and the posterior fossa area (PFA) and perimeter (PFP) were assessed. Growth charts were produced. Thirty-nine fetuses diagnosed with PF malformations were analyzed by calculating the z-scores of PFA, PFP, TOD and CTD, relative to the developed nomograms. Results Of the 378 healthy fetuses initially included, there were 281 with adequate visualization of the PF borders; i.e. PF mid-sagittal plane morphometry was feasible in 74.3% of cases. There was a linear relationship between each of PFA, PFP, TOD and CTD, and gestational age, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.97, 0.97, 0.96 and 0.95, respectively (P < 0.001 for each). Chiari II malformation (CM-II) and Dandy-Walker malformation (DWM) were associated with the greatest difference in PF size compared with normal; PFA z-scores exceeded 2.6 in all five DWM cases and were below -2.66 in all 11 CM-II cases. Conclusions Sonographic evaluation of fetal PF size in the mid-sagittal plane is feasible. Our constructed nomograms provide reference data that may be helpful when evaluating PF congenital malformations.
KW - 3D ultrasound
KW - Chiari malformation
KW - Dandy-Walker malformation
KW - clivotentorial distance
KW - fetus
KW - tecto-occipital distance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893786207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/uog.12508
DO - 10.1002/uog.12508
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 23671019
AN - SCOPUS:84893786207
SN - 0960-7692
VL - 43
SP - 147
EP - 153
JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 2
ER -