Fetal neuroimaging: Ultrasound, MRI, or both?

Lourens R. Pistorius, Petra M. Hellmann, Gerard H.A. Visser, Gustavo Malinger, Daniela Prayer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Much has been written recently about the relative merits and demerits of fetal imaging with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Unfortunately, the arguments often generate more heat than light. We attempted to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each modality from the literature, and to arrive at some practical recommendations on when to use which imaging modality. In conclusion, combining neurosonography and MRI is mostly redundant, but occasionally complementary. Both are operator dependant and neither technique obviates the need for a thorough knowledge of normal and abnormal neuroanatomy. In early pregnancy, and where repeated assessment is needed, ultrasound has the obvious advantage. Where ultrasound is difficult, as in the obese patient or a patient with severe oligohydramnios, better images might be obtained by MRI examination, although a special MR system is required for patients weighing more than 150 kg. MRI might also identify fetal ischemic lesions early after an insult such as severe maternal trauma or death of a monochorionic co-twin. There is a synergy between ultrasound and MRI for the diagnosis of certain conditions, such as congenital cytomegalovirus infection or cerebellar telangiectasis. Local conditions and expertise obviously influence the accuracy of both modalities. Both ultrasound and MRI should be performed to the highest possible standard, and the final diagnosis should be made in a multidisciplinary setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)733-745
Number of pages13
JournalObstetrical and Gynecological Survey
Volume63
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fetal neuroimaging: Ultrasound, MRI, or both?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this