Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Favorable safety outcomes of a perioperative propranolol and etodolac regimen in cancer patients in four randomized controlled trials

*Corresponding author for this work
  • Tel Aviv University
  • Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Rabin Medical Center Israel
  • Soroka Medical Center
  • Assuta Ashdod Hospital
  • Kaplan Medical Center Israel
  • Assaf Harofeh Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background – The perioperative use of the β-adrenergic blocker, propranolol, and/or the semi-selective COX-2 inhibitor, etodolac, has improved biomarkers of cancer metastasis in several small randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, the combined regimen showed potential to improve disease-free survival (DFS). Methods – We report data from our four RCTs including 148 patients with breast (n = 38), colorectal (n = 34 & n = 46), and pancreatic (n = 30) cancers. Treatment began 5 days pre-operatively, and continued for 5–30 postoperatively. Propranolol (slow-release) was initiated at 20mg twice daily (b.i.d), increased to 80mgb.i.d on surgery day, and gradually decreased thereafter to 20mgb.i.d. Etodolac was provided at 400mgb.i.d. The primary endpoints were perioperative safety outcomes, including adverse events (AEs) up to 30-day postoperatively, and 16 blood indices. Secondary outcomes were long-term oncological outcomes of 8-year DFS and overall survival (OS). Results – Bradycardia occurred in 12% of treated vs. 3% of placebo patients (p = 0.057), and was easily resolved by temporary withholding β-blockade. Weakness, nausea, pain, infection, bleeding, leakage, tissue-healing, or death were not significantly affected. Drug treatment promoted eosinophils in pancreatic cancer patients (p = 0.015), increased potassium (p = 0.013), and decreased albumin (p = 0.016) in CRC patients; however, these effects did not remain significant after false discovery rate (FDR) correction. In CRC, treatment improved 8-year DFS (2/15 vs. 9/18, p = 0.034), although this exploratory analysis was underpowered. Conclusion – These findings suggest the safety of this inexpensive and easy-to-implement perioperative propranolol and etodolac regimen in patients participating in these RCTs. Clinical Trial Registration – https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00502684, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00888797, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03919461, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03838029, identifier NCT00502684, NCT00888797, NCT03919461, NCT03838029.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1823113
JournalFrontiers in Pharmacology
Volume17
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026

Funding

Funders
Israel Medical Society
Israel Science Foundation
SPARK Tel Aviv University
National Institutes of Health
Israel Cancer Research Fund
Ministry of Health, State of Israel

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • COX2 inhibitors
    • etodolac
    • metastatic disease
    • non-selective B-blockers
    • perioperative care
    • propranolol
    • randomized controlled trial
    • safety

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Favorable safety outcomes of a perioperative propranolol and etodolac regimen in cancer patients in four randomized controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this