Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fast winning strategies in Maker-Breaker games

  • Dan Hefetz*
  • , Michael Krivelevich
  • , Miloš Stojaković
  • , Tibor Szabó
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Tel Aviv University
  • University of Novi Sad
  • ETH Zurich - Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics (IPA)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Scopus citations

Abstract

We consider unbiased Maker-Breaker games played on the edge set of the complete graph Kn on n vertices. Quite a few such games were researched in the literature and are known to be Maker's win. Here we are interested in estimating the minimum number of moves needed for Maker in order to win these games. We prove the following results, for sufficiently large n: (1)Maker can construct a Hamilton cycle within at most n + 2 moves. This improves the classical bound of 2n due to Chvátal and Erdo{combining double acute accent}s [V. Chvátal, P. Erdo{combining double acute accent}s, Biased positional games, Ann. Discrete Math. 2 (1978) 221-228] and is almost tight;(2)Maker can construct a perfect matching (for even n) within n / 2 + 1 moves, and this is tight;(3)For a fixed k ≥ 3, Maker can construct a spanning k-connected graph within (1 + o (1)) k n / 2 moves, and this is obviously asymptotically tight. Several other related results are derived as well.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-47
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Combinatorial Theory. Series B
Volume99
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009

Funding

FundersFunder number
USA-Israel BSF2002-133, 526/05, 2006-322
Israel Science Foundation
Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja
Provincial Secretariat for Higher Education and Scientific Research, Autonomous Province of Vojvodina

    Keywords

    • Hamilton cycle
    • Maker-Breaker games
    • Perfect matching
    • k-connected graph

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Fast winning strategies in Maker-Breaker games'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this