TY - JOUR
T1 - Fast Acting, Dry Powder, Needle-Free, Intranasal Epinephrine Spray
T2 - A Promising Future Treatment for Anaphylaxis
AU - Tal, Yuval
AU - Ribak, Yaarit
AU - Rubin, Limor
AU - Talmon, Aviv
AU - Shamriz, Oded
AU - Hershko, Alon Y.
AU - Blotnick, Simcha
AU - Bouhajib, Mohammed
AU - Krayz, Galia Temtsin
AU - Abrutzky, Carolina
AU - Megiddo, Dalia
AU - Lapidot, Tair
AU - Caraco, Yoseph
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Background: Epinephrine intramuscular (IM) autoinjector is a life-saving drug for the emergency treatment of immediate-type allergic reactions (type I). Nevertheless, it is sometimes applied incorrectly or underused because of short shelf life, high costs, fear of use, or inconvenience of carrying. FMXIN002, a nasal powder spray of epinephrine, was developed as a needle-free alternative. Objective: To compare epinephrine pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety after the administration of the FMXIN002 nasal spray versus autoinjector. Methods: An open-label trial was performed in 12 adults with seasonal allergic rhinitis without asthma. Epinephrine pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety were compared between FMXIN002 (1.6 mg and 3.2 mg) administered intranasally with/without a nasal allergen challenge and IM (0.3 mg) EpiPen. Results: FMXIN002 3.2 mg, administered after a nasal allergen challenge, displayed a shorter Tmax than EpiPen (median: 2.5 minutes vs 9.0 minutes, statistically nonsignificant [NS]) and a significantly shorter time when the measured analyte concentration is 100 pg/mL during the absorption phase pg/mL (median: 1.0 minutes vs 3.0 minutes for FMXIN002, P < .02). Moreover, FMXIN002 3.2 mg administered after the challenge test has resulted in a doubling of the maximal measured plasma analyte concentration over the sampling period (1110 vs 551 pg/mL, NS); area under the curve from 0 to 8 hours was 56% higher (672 vs 431 hours pg/mL, compared with EpiPen, NS). Pharmacodynamic response was comparable at all treatments. FMXIN002 was well tolerated, and treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were mild, local, and resolved spontaneously. No AEs were reported after the administration of EpiPen in our study. FMXIN002 was stable for 2 years at room temperature conditions. However, variability in the pharmacokinetics (expressed in coefficient of variation) is high. Having a prior nasal allergen challenge results in a substantial increase and speed of absorption. Conclusions: Intranasal absorption of dry powder epinephrine is faster than EpiPen offering a clinical advantage in the short therapeutic window for the treatment of anaphylaxis. The FMXIN002 product offers a needle-free, pocket-size, safe, user-friendly, and stable alternative to epinephrine autoinjectors.
AB - Background: Epinephrine intramuscular (IM) autoinjector is a life-saving drug for the emergency treatment of immediate-type allergic reactions (type I). Nevertheless, it is sometimes applied incorrectly or underused because of short shelf life, high costs, fear of use, or inconvenience of carrying. FMXIN002, a nasal powder spray of epinephrine, was developed as a needle-free alternative. Objective: To compare epinephrine pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety after the administration of the FMXIN002 nasal spray versus autoinjector. Methods: An open-label trial was performed in 12 adults with seasonal allergic rhinitis without asthma. Epinephrine pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety were compared between FMXIN002 (1.6 mg and 3.2 mg) administered intranasally with/without a nasal allergen challenge and IM (0.3 mg) EpiPen. Results: FMXIN002 3.2 mg, administered after a nasal allergen challenge, displayed a shorter Tmax than EpiPen (median: 2.5 minutes vs 9.0 minutes, statistically nonsignificant [NS]) and a significantly shorter time when the measured analyte concentration is 100 pg/mL during the absorption phase pg/mL (median: 1.0 minutes vs 3.0 minutes for FMXIN002, P < .02). Moreover, FMXIN002 3.2 mg administered after the challenge test has resulted in a doubling of the maximal measured plasma analyte concentration over the sampling period (1110 vs 551 pg/mL, NS); area under the curve from 0 to 8 hours was 56% higher (672 vs 431 hours pg/mL, compared with EpiPen, NS). Pharmacodynamic response was comparable at all treatments. FMXIN002 was well tolerated, and treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were mild, local, and resolved spontaneously. No AEs were reported after the administration of EpiPen in our study. FMXIN002 was stable for 2 years at room temperature conditions. However, variability in the pharmacokinetics (expressed in coefficient of variation) is high. Having a prior nasal allergen challenge results in a substantial increase and speed of absorption. Conclusions: Intranasal absorption of dry powder epinephrine is faster than EpiPen offering a clinical advantage in the short therapeutic window for the treatment of anaphylaxis. The FMXIN002 product offers a needle-free, pocket-size, safe, user-friendly, and stable alternative to epinephrine autoinjectors.
KW - Anaphylaxis
KW - Bioavailability
KW - Epinephrine
KW - Intranasal
KW - Powder
KW - Spray
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166574006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.06.044
DO - 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.06.044
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 37394178
AN - SCOPUS:85166574006
SN - 2213-2198
VL - 11
SP - 3047
EP - 3054
JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
IS - 10
ER -