TY - JOUR
T1 - Family history associated with pelvic organ prolapse in young women
AU - Alcalay, Menachem
AU - Stav, Kobi
AU - Eisenberg, Vered H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, The International Urogynecological Association.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - Introduction and hypothesis: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) among young women is a relatively rare disorder with a unique clinical background. The objective of our study was to investigate the relative risk factors for POP and the relationship between family history and POP development in young women. Methods: In a retrospective longitudinal study we investigated 26 young patients (age <45 years) who underwent POP surgery and compared them to a control group of 26 patients (age >55 years) who underwent similar surgery and were matched with regard to parity. All women were interviewed for family history of POP, POP surgery among first-degree relatives, and hernia repair. Results: Family history of POP was five times more prevalent among women in the study group than in the control group (46 % vs. 8 %, P < 0.01). Moreover, POP surgery among the first-degree relatives was significantly more prevalent in the study group (23.1 % vs. 3.8 %, p < 0.05). The prevalence of a family history of POP in more than one first-degree relative (11.5 % vs. 3.84 %, p = 0.3) and the family history of hernia repair among first-degree relatives (11.5 % vs. 15.4 %) did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: A family history of POP is significantly more common in younger affected women than in older affected women. We suggest that future genetic studies should concentrate on this specific population.
AB - Introduction and hypothesis: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) among young women is a relatively rare disorder with a unique clinical background. The objective of our study was to investigate the relative risk factors for POP and the relationship between family history and POP development in young women. Methods: In a retrospective longitudinal study we investigated 26 young patients (age <45 years) who underwent POP surgery and compared them to a control group of 26 patients (age >55 years) who underwent similar surgery and were matched with regard to parity. All women were interviewed for family history of POP, POP surgery among first-degree relatives, and hernia repair. Results: Family history of POP was five times more prevalent among women in the study group than in the control group (46 % vs. 8 %, P < 0.01). Moreover, POP surgery among the first-degree relatives was significantly more prevalent in the study group (23.1 % vs. 3.8 %, p < 0.05). The prevalence of a family history of POP in more than one first-degree relative (11.5 % vs. 3.84 %, p = 0.3) and the family history of hernia repair among first-degree relatives (11.5 % vs. 15.4 %) did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: A family history of POP is significantly more common in younger affected women than in older affected women. We suggest that future genetic studies should concentrate on this specific population.
KW - Age
KW - Family history
KW - Pelvic organ prolapse
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948735613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00192-015-2779-5
DO - 10.1007/s00192-015-2779-5
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 26174658
AN - SCOPUS:84948735613
SN - 0937-3462
VL - 26
SP - 1773
EP - 1776
JO - International Urogynecology Journal
JF - International Urogynecology Journal
IS - 12
ER -