TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors affecting the introduction of new vaccines to poor nations
T2 - A comparative study of the Haemophilus influenzae type B and hepatitis B vaccines
AU - Glatman-Freedman, Aharona
AU - Cohen, Mary Louise
AU - Nichols, Katherine A.
AU - Porges, Robert F.
AU - Saludes, Ivy Rayos
AU - Steffens, Kevin
AU - Rodwin, Victor G.
AU - Britt, David W.
N1 - Funding Information:
GAVI has already begun modifying its criteria for financial support for fragile countries. These include providing funds to strengthen health systems ( www.gavialliance.org/performance/evaluation/index.php ) and requiring lower co-pays for vaccines ( http://hibaction.org/resources/hibfocus/061117_alert/ ) . The need for additional support and different rules of engagement with those nations (many of which are post-conflict) have been discussed during GAVI's meetings ( www.gavialliance.org/resources/19brd_FragileStates.pdf ). Analysis of the second phase of GAVI's funding (from 2007 to 2010) will be required to evaluate the success of the new changes in affecting new vaccine introduction. Ultimately, established criteria, such as those used by the Center for Global Development to assess the long-term success of global health initiatives, namely: scale, importance, impact, duration and cost-effectiveness , will probably be most suitable for this purpose.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Background: A major effort to introduce new vaccines into poor nations of the world was initiated in recent years with the help of the GAVI alliance. The first vaccines introduced have been the Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) and the hepatitis B (Hep B) vaccines. The introduction of these vaccines during the first phase of GAVI's operations demonstrated considerable variability. We set out to study the factors affecting the introduction of these vaccines. The African Region (AFRO), where new vaccines were introduced to a substantial number of countries during the first phase of GAVI's funding, was selected for this study. Methodology/Principal Findings: GAVI-eligible AFRO countries with a population of 0.5 million or more were included in the study. Countries were analyzed and compared for new vaccine introduction, healthcare indicators, financial indicators related to healthcare and country-level Governance Indicators, using One Way ANOVA, correlation analysis and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Introduction of new vaccines into AFRO nations was associated primarily with high countrylevel Governance Indicator scores. The use of individual Governance Indicator scores, as well as a combined Governance Indicator score we developed, demonstrated similar results. Conclusions/Significance: Our study results indicate that good country-level governance is an imperative pre-requisite for the successful early introduction of new vaccines into poor African nations. Enhanced support measures may be required to effectively introduce new vaccines to countries with low governance scores. The combined governance score we developed may thus constitute a useful tool for helping philanthropic organizations make decisions regarding the type of support needed by different countries to achieve success.
AB - Background: A major effort to introduce new vaccines into poor nations of the world was initiated in recent years with the help of the GAVI alliance. The first vaccines introduced have been the Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) and the hepatitis B (Hep B) vaccines. The introduction of these vaccines during the first phase of GAVI's operations demonstrated considerable variability. We set out to study the factors affecting the introduction of these vaccines. The African Region (AFRO), where new vaccines were introduced to a substantial number of countries during the first phase of GAVI's funding, was selected for this study. Methodology/Principal Findings: GAVI-eligible AFRO countries with a population of 0.5 million or more were included in the study. Countries were analyzed and compared for new vaccine introduction, healthcare indicators, financial indicators related to healthcare and country-level Governance Indicators, using One Way ANOVA, correlation analysis and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Introduction of new vaccines into AFRO nations was associated primarily with high countrylevel Governance Indicator scores. The use of individual Governance Indicator scores, as well as a combined Governance Indicator score we developed, demonstrated similar results. Conclusions/Significance: Our study results indicate that good country-level governance is an imperative pre-requisite for the successful early introduction of new vaccines into poor African nations. Enhanced support measures may be required to effectively introduce new vaccines to countries with low governance scores. The combined governance score we developed may thus constitute a useful tool for helping philanthropic organizations make decisions regarding the type of support needed by different countries to achieve success.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149485218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0013802
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0013802
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 21072192
AN - SCOPUS:78149485218
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 5
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 11
M1 - e13802
ER -