TY - JOUR
T1 - Face perception
T2 - Domain specific, not process specific
AU - Yovel, Galit
AU - Kanwisher, Nancy
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Chris Baker, Hans Op de Beeck, Elinor McKone, and Rachel Robbins for their comments on the manuscript. We also thank Nao Gamo, Kevin Der, and Michael Ogrydziak for help with behavioral data collection as well as Stephanie Chow for help with stimulus generation. This research was supported by NIMH grant 66696 (N.K.); NEI grant EY13455 (N.K.); the National Center for Research Resources (P41-RR14075, R01 RR16594-01A1, and the NCRR BIRN Morphometric Project BIRN002); and the Mental Illness and Neuroscience Discovery (MIND) Institute.
PY - 2004/12/2
Y1 - 2004/12/2
N2 - Evidence that face perception is mediated by special cognitive and neural mechanisms comes from fMRI studies of the fusiform face area (FFA) and behavioral studies of the face inversion effect. Here, we used these two methods to ask whether face perception mechanisms are stimulus specific, process specific, or both. Subjects discriminated pairs of upright or inverted faces or house stimuli that differed in either the spatial distance among parts (configuration) or the shape of the parts. The FFA showed a much higher response to faces than to houses, but no preference for the configuration task over the part task. Similarly, the behavioral inversion effect was as large in the part task as the configuration task for faces, but absent in both part and configuration tasks for houses. These findings indicate that face perception mechanisms are not process specific for parts or configuration but are domain specific for face stimuli per se.
AB - Evidence that face perception is mediated by special cognitive and neural mechanisms comes from fMRI studies of the fusiform face area (FFA) and behavioral studies of the face inversion effect. Here, we used these two methods to ask whether face perception mechanisms are stimulus specific, process specific, or both. Subjects discriminated pairs of upright or inverted faces or house stimuli that differed in either the spatial distance among parts (configuration) or the shape of the parts. The FFA showed a much higher response to faces than to houses, but no preference for the configuration task over the part task. Similarly, the behavioral inversion effect was as large in the part task as the configuration task for faces, but absent in both part and configuration tasks for houses. These findings indicate that face perception mechanisms are not process specific for parts or configuration but are domain specific for face stimuli per se.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9644260530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.018
DO - 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.018
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 15572118
AN - SCOPUS:9644260530
SN - 0896-6273
VL - 44
SP - 889
EP - 898
JO - Neuron
JF - Neuron
IS - 5
ER -