TY - JOUR
T1 - Extremely dense breasts
T2 - A comprehensive review of increased cancer risk and supplementary screening methods
AU - Nissan, Noam
AU - Ochoa Albiztegui, Rosa Elena
AU - Fruchtman-Brot, Hila
AU - Gluskin, Jill
AU - Arita, Yuki
AU - Amir, Tali
AU - Reiner, Jeffrey S.
AU - Feigin, Kimberly
AU - Mango, Victoria L.
AU - Jochelson, Maxine S.
AU - Sung, Janice S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Women with extremely dense breasts account for approximately 10% of the screening population and face an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. At the same time, the sensitivity of mammography, the first-line screening modality, is significantly reduced in this breast density group, owing to the masking effect of the abundant fibroglandular tissue. Consequently, this population has garnered increasing scientific attention due to the unique diagnostic challenge they present. Several research initiatives have attempted to address this diagnostic challenge by incorporating supplemental imaging modalities such as ultrasound, MRI, and contrast-enhanced mammography. Each of these modalities offers different benefits as well as limitations, both clinically and practically, including considerations of availability and costs. The purpose of this article is to critically review the background, latest scientific evidence, and future directions for the use of the various supplemental screening techniques for women with extremely dense breasts.
AB - Women with extremely dense breasts account for approximately 10% of the screening population and face an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. At the same time, the sensitivity of mammography, the first-line screening modality, is significantly reduced in this breast density group, owing to the masking effect of the abundant fibroglandular tissue. Consequently, this population has garnered increasing scientific attention due to the unique diagnostic challenge they present. Several research initiatives have attempted to address this diagnostic challenge by incorporating supplemental imaging modalities such as ultrasound, MRI, and contrast-enhanced mammography. Each of these modalities offers different benefits as well as limitations, both clinically and practically, including considerations of availability and costs. The purpose of this article is to critically review the background, latest scientific evidence, and future directions for the use of the various supplemental screening techniques for women with extremely dense breasts.
KW - Breast neoplasm
KW - Cancer screening
KW - Contrast-enhanced mammography
KW - Mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209569525&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111837
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111837
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
AN - SCOPUS:85209569525
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 182
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
M1 - 111837
ER -