TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health
T2 - Theoretical and methodological guidance
AU - Markevych, Iana
AU - Schoierer, Julia
AU - Hartig, Terry
AU - Chudnovsky, Alexandra
AU - Hystad, Perry
AU - Dzhambov, Angel M.
AU - de Vries, Sjerp
AU - Triguero-Mas, Margarita
AU - Brauer, Michael
AU - Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.
AU - Lupp, Gerd
AU - Richardson, Elizabeth A.
AU - Astell-Burt, Thomas
AU - Dimitrova, Donka
AU - Feng, Xiaoqi
AU - Sadeh, Maya
AU - Standl, Marie
AU - Heinrich, Joachim
AU - Fuertes, Elaine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Background In a rapidly urbanizing world, many people have little contact with natural environments, which may affect health and well-being. Existing reviews generally conclude that residential greenspace is beneficial to health. However, the processes generating these benefits and how they can be best promoted remain unclear. Objectives During an Expert Workshop held in September 2016, the evidence linking greenspace and health was reviewed from a transdisciplinary standpoint, with a particular focus on potential underlying biopsychosocial pathways and how these can be explored and organized to support policy-relevant population health research. Discussions Potential pathways linking greenspace to health are here presented in three domains, which emphasize three general functions of greenspace: reducing harm (e.g. reducing exposure to air pollution, noise and heat), restoring capacities (e.g. attention restoration and physiological stress recovery) and building capacities (e.g. encouraging physical activity and facilitating social cohesion). Interrelations between among the three domains are also noted. Among several recommendations, future studies should: use greenspace and behavioural measures that are relevant to hypothesized pathways; include assessment of presence, access and use of greenspace; use longitudinal, interventional and (quasi)experimental study designs to assess causation; and include low and middle income countries given their absence in the existing literature. Cultural, climatic, geographic and other contextual factors also need further consideration. Conclusions While the existing evidence affirms beneficial impacts of greenspace on health, much remains to be learned about the specific pathways and functional form of such relationships, and how these may vary by context, population groups and health outcomes. This Report provides guidance for further epidemiological research with the goal of creating new evidence upon which to develop policy recommendations.
AB - Background In a rapidly urbanizing world, many people have little contact with natural environments, which may affect health and well-being. Existing reviews generally conclude that residential greenspace is beneficial to health. However, the processes generating these benefits and how they can be best promoted remain unclear. Objectives During an Expert Workshop held in September 2016, the evidence linking greenspace and health was reviewed from a transdisciplinary standpoint, with a particular focus on potential underlying biopsychosocial pathways and how these can be explored and organized to support policy-relevant population health research. Discussions Potential pathways linking greenspace to health are here presented in three domains, which emphasize three general functions of greenspace: reducing harm (e.g. reducing exposure to air pollution, noise and heat), restoring capacities (e.g. attention restoration and physiological stress recovery) and building capacities (e.g. encouraging physical activity and facilitating social cohesion). Interrelations between among the three domains are also noted. Among several recommendations, future studies should: use greenspace and behavioural measures that are relevant to hypothesized pathways; include assessment of presence, access and use of greenspace; use longitudinal, interventional and (quasi)experimental study designs to assess causation; and include low and middle income countries given their absence in the existing literature. Cultural, climatic, geographic and other contextual factors also need further consideration. Conclusions While the existing evidence affirms beneficial impacts of greenspace on health, much remains to be learned about the specific pathways and functional form of such relationships, and how these may vary by context, population groups and health outcomes. This Report provides guidance for further epidemiological research with the goal of creating new evidence upon which to develop policy recommendations.
KW - Green spaces
KW - Greenness
KW - Greenspace
KW - Mediation analysis
KW - Pathways
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021677559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028
DO - 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 28672128
AN - SCOPUS:85021677559
SN - 0013-9351
VL - 158
SP - 301
EP - 317
JO - Environmental Research
JF - Environmental Research
ER -